Publication:
Suprascapular nerve block in hemiplegic shoulder pain: comparison of the effectiveness of placebo, local anesthetic, and corticosteroid injections-a randomized controlled study

dc.contributor.coauthorTerlemez, Rana
dc.contributor.coauthorÇiftçi, Selda
dc.contributor.coauthorDoğu, Beril
dc.contributor.coauthorYılmaz, Figen
dc.contributor.coauthorKuran, Banu
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorTopaloğlu, Mahir
dc.contributor.kuprofileDoctor
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteN/A
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:27:43Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractBackground: Shoulder pain is a common complication of hemiplegic patients that can interrupt their rehabilitation program and is associated with poorer outcomes. The usefulness of the suprascapular nerve block. (SSNB) in the stroke population has been suggested, but some concerns still remain. Objectives: To investigate the effect of SSNB on pain intensity and passive range ofmotion (PROM) in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP). Study Design: A prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trial was conductedin 34 stroke patients with HSP. They were randomly divided into three groups: Localanesthetic (LA) injection into the trapezius muscle (placebo group), LA injection into thesuprascapular notch, and LA and corticosteroid (CS) injections into the suprascapularnotch.The main outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) scores evaluated before andafter administration of the injection at 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month. Results: There were significant decreases in the VAS scores with all three injections at all follow-up time points (p: 0.001 for the placebo group, p <0.001 for the LA group, and p <0.001 for the LA+CS group). When changes in VAS scores were compared between the groups, the LA+CS group demonstrated a higher decrease in VAS than the placebo group. Improvement in the PROM was seen only in the LA and LA+CS groups. Conclusions: The findings of this study support the use of an SSNB with or without CS, to increase the range of motion in the affected shoulder, especially during the rehabilitation period.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10072-020-04362-0
dc.identifier.eissn1590-3478
dc.identifier.issn1590-1874
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084472067
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04362-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/11764
dc.identifier.wos531529400001
dc.keywordsSuprascapular nerve block
dc.keywordsHemiplegic shoulder pain
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Italia Srl
dc.sourceNeurological Sciences
dc.subjectClinical neuropsychology
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.titleSuprascapular nerve block in hemiplegic shoulder pain: comparison of the effectiveness of placebo, local anesthetic, and corticosteroid injections-a randomized controlled study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0002-9364-4512
local.contributor.kuauthorTopaloğlu, Mahir

Files