Publication: Urethral sphincter length but not prostatic apex shape in preoperative MRI is associated with mid-term continence rates after radical prostatectomy
Files
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Hoeh, B.
Wenzel, M.
Müller, M.
Wittler, C.
Schlenke, E.
Hohenhorst, J.L.
Kƶllermann, J.
Steuber, T.
Graefen, M.
Bernatz, S.
Publication Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
NO
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background: to test the impact of urethral sphincter length (USL) and anatomic variants of prostatic apex (Lee-type classification) in preoperative multiparametric magnet resonance imaging (mpMRI) on mid-term continence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: we relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify patients who underwent RP between 03/2018 and 12/2019 with preoperative mpMRI and data available on mid-term (>6 months post-surgery) urinary continence, defined as usage 0/1 (-safety) pad/24 h. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to test for predictor status of USL and prostatic apex variants, defined in mpMRI measurements. Results: of 68 eligible patients, rate of mid-term urinary continence was 81% (n = 55). Median coronal (15.1 vs. 12.5 mm) and sagittal (15.4 vs. 11.1 mm) USL were longer in patients reporting urinary continence in mid-term follow-up (both p < 0.01). No difference was recorded for prostatic apex variants distribution (Lee-type) between continent vs. incontinent patients (p = 0.4). In separate multivariable logistic regression models, coronal (odds ratio (OR): 1.35) and sagittal (OR: 1.67) USL, but not Lee-type, were independent predictors for mid-term continence. Conclusion: USL, but not apex anatomy, in preoperative mpMRI was associated with higher rates of urinary continence at mid-term follow-up.
Source
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
Subject
General and internal medicine
Citation
Has Part
Source
Diagnostics
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics12030701