Publication:
Effect of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage on incontinence following robotic radical prostatectomy

dc.contributor.coauthorMadendere, Serdar
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorKılıç, Mert
dc.contributor.kuauthorKöseoğlu, Ersin
dc.contributor.kuauthorBaygül, Arzu Eden
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalbay, Mevlana Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T07:02:47Z
dc.date.available2026-03-27
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the impact of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage (UAL) on urinary incontinence (UI) in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: Data from 86 patients who underwent RARP between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Cystography was performed on the seventh day, and urinary catheters were removed for patients with mild leakage. For patients with major leakage, cystography was repeated on the 14th day. Patients with UI and those using pads were identified separately and assessed for associated risk factors. Results: The UAL rate was 32.6%, with an equal division between minor and major UAL. The average an follow-up period was 36 +/- 22 months. UI was present in 28 patients (32.6%), of whom 11 (12.8%) required pads, while 17 patients (19.8%) had mild UI and did not use pads. Seventyfive patients (87.2%) did not use pads. Among pad users, 6 (7.0%) used 1 pad, 2 (2.3%) used 2 pads, and 3 (3.5%) used 3 pads daily. UAL did not significantly impact UI (P = .479), and no significant relationship was found between major UAL and UI (P = .727). None of the demographic or perioperative variables were associated with UI. Comparison between pad users and nonpad users revealed that neither UAL nor major UAL was a significant factor (P = .743 and P = .290, respectively). Conclusion: UAL was not found to influence mid to long-term UI. However, in patients with major UAL, prolonged catheterization may have a protective effect against UI. Randomized studies comparing catheter removal on the seventh day versus later removal in patients with UAL could provide further insight.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessBronze
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ2
dc.identifier.doi10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1086-8089
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pubmed41333989
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105025662882
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2025.00006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32813
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wos001668970300002
dc.keywordsAnastomotic leak
dc.keywordsCystography
dc.keywordsProstatectomy
dc.keywordsRobot-assisted
dc.keywordsUrinary incontinence
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSociety of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeons
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleEffect of urethrovesical anastomotic leakage on incontinence following robotic radical prostatectomy
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files