Publication: Investigating transcranial direct current stimulation as a therapeutic intervention for conduction Aphasia: a double-blind controlled study
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Adiguzel, S.
Simge, S. B.
Serkan, A.
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
eng
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Aphasia is a language disorder that develops as a result of cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative events, with conduction aphasia being a subtype characterized by speech errors and difficulties in object naming and word repetition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a valuable neuromodulation technique employed both in clinical settings for therapeutic interventions and in neuroscience research to investigate brain function and neuroplasticity. This study investigated tDCS as a therapeutic intervention, aiming to increase synaptic plasticity of perilesional cortical regions by modulating neural excitation. Materials and Methods: Using a double-blind, controlled design, 20 patients were randomly allocated to receive either active anodal or sham stimulation for 5 consecutive days. Assessments were conducted prestimulation, poststimulation, and at 1-month follow-up. The study hypothesized that anodal stimulation would reduce paraphasias while improving object naming and repetition abilities. Results: The findings showed that the active group’s paraphasia scores during object naming tasks showed a significant reduction when compared with the sham group. For object naming ability, although between-group differences were not significant, the active group demonstrated significant within-group improvement from pre- to poststimulation ( P < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.54), demonstrating a moderate magnitude of effect with potential clinical relevance. No significant differences were observed in repetition abilities. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tDCS positively impacts language disabilities in conduction aphasia, particularly for paraphasia and object naming tasks. The moderate effect size in object naming improvement warrants further investigation with larger sample sizes to establish whether tDCS is a viable therapeutic option for conduction aphasia rehabilitation programs.
Source
Publisher
Wolters Kluwer Health
Subject
Life sciences, Neuroscience, Neurology, Cognitive neuroscience, Social sciences, Psychology, Clinical psychology
Citation
Has Part
Source
Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.4103/nsn.nsn_59_25
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
Copyrights Note
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as N/A
