Publication:
The relationship between prognostic and organ failure scoring systems such as APACHE II, SAPS II, MODS, SOFA and GCS and quantitative amino acid levels in intensive care unit patients

dc.contributor.coauthorBasat, Sema Uçak
dc.contributor.coauthorSivritepe, Rıdvan
dc.contributor.coauthorBasat, Okcan
dc.contributor.coauthorDuygu, Aydın
dc.contributor.coauthorEker, Pınar
dc.contributor.coauthorÖzdil, Kamil
dc.contributor.kuauthorBaygül, Arzu Eden
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid272290
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T13:46:07Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the prognostic and organ failure scoring systems and quantitative amino acid levels in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: a total of 45 patients over 45 years old, who were admitted to the ICU, were included in the study. Physical examinations of all patients were performed, and blood tests (including serum amino acids) were analyzed. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), and glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores of patients were calculated. Risk ratios were determined according to the mortality and organ failure scores of patients, and patients were grouped as high-risk and low risk. All these parameters were compared between these groups, and the relationship between amino acid levels and risk scores was evaluated. Statistical significance level was determined as a p-value of <0.05. Results: this study was carried out on 45 patients, 23 females and 22 males. The mean age of the patients was 74 +/- 11 years. In high-risk patients compared to low-risk group; methionine, ornithine, and phenylalanine levels according to APACHE II; beta-alanine, cystine, 3-methyl histidine, phenylalanine, and proline levels according to SAPS II; alanine, beta-alanine, phenylalanine, glycine, histidine, methionine, and ornithine levels according to GCS were significant different (p<0.05 for all). We found a significant positive correlation between the APACHE II score and beta alanine (r=0.466; p=0.001), citrulline (r=0.394; p=0.007), ethanolamine (r=0.366; p=0.013), histidine (r=0.353; p=0.017), 3-methyl histidine (r=0.450; p=0.002), ornithine (r=0.445; p=0.002), phenylalanine (r=0.548; p<0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between the SAPS II score and beta alanine (r=0.403; p=0.006), cystathionine (r=0.341; p=0.022), ethanolamine (r=0.356; p=0.017), 3-methyl histidine (r=0.402; p=0.006), ornithine (r=0.349; p=0.019), phenylalanine (r=0.525; p<0.001) and between the MODS score and alanine (r=0.340; p=0.022), beta alanine (r=0.407; p=0.006), cystathionine (r=0.352; p=0.018), ethanolamine (r=0.358; p=0.0169), histidine (r=0.495; p=0.001), 3-methyl histidine (r=0.407; p=0.006), methionine (r=0.462; p=0.001), ornithine (r=0.360; p=0.015), phenylalanine (r=0.621; p<0.001), proline (r=0.445; p=0.002). We found a significant positive correlation between the SOFA score and alanine (r=0.547; p<0.0019), beta-alanine (r=0.354; p=0.0179), arginine (r=0.423; p=0.004), cystathionine (r=0.423; p=0.004), ethanolamine (r=0.437; p=0.003), glycine (r=0.399; p=0.007), histidine (r=0.512; p<0.001), 3-methyl histidine (r=0.327; p=0.028), leucine (r=0.376; p=0.011), methionine (r=0.585; p<0.001), ornithine (r=0.467; p=0.001), phenylalanine (r=0.644; p<0.001), proline (r=0.523; p<0.001), threonine (r=0.371; p=0.012). Also, there was a significant negative correlation between GCS score and beta alanine (r=-0.390; p=0.008), ethanolamine (r=-0.364; p=0.014), glycine (r=-0.360; p=0.015), ornithine (r=-0.510; p=0.000), phenylalanine (r=-0.433; p=0.003). Conclusion: this study found significantly higher methionine, ornithine, phenylalanine, beta-alanine, cystine, 3-methyl histidine, proline, alanine, glycine, and histidine levels in patients with high-risk scores.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyTR Dizin
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume17
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/BMJ.galenos.2021.78790
dc.identifier.eissn1305-9327
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR03405
dc.identifier.issn1305-9319
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.4274/BMJ.galenos.2021.78790
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122502802
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/3680
dc.identifier.wos735123100009
dc.keywordsAmino acids
dc.keywordsIntensive care units
dc.keywordsPrognosis
dc.keywordsRisk factors
dc.keywordsAPACHE
dc.keywordsSimplified acute physiology score
dc.keywordsOrgan dysfunction scores
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherGalenos Yayınevi
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10191
dc.sourceMedical Journal of Bakırköy / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi
dc.subjectGeneral and internal medicine
dc.titleThe relationship between prognostic and organ failure scoring systems such as APACHE II, SAPS II, MODS, SOFA and GCS and quantitative amino acid levels in intensive care unit patients
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-0392-6709
local.contributor.kuauthorBaygül, Arzu Eden

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10191.pdf
Size:
292.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format