Publication:
Standardizing the definition of each colon cancer segment: Delphi consensus on clinical decision-making for oncologic outcomes

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Kuzu, Mehmet Ayhan
Benlice, Çiğdem
Parvaiz, Amjad C.
Görgün, Emre
Bertelsen, Claus Anders
Wexner, Steven D.
Dozois, Eric J.
Hohenberger, Werner Max
Miskovic, Danilo
Sugihara, Kenichi

Editor & Affiliation

Compiler & Affiliation

Translator

Other Contributor

Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data registries lack a definitive classification system that distinguishes different locations of colon cancer from one another. OBJECTIVE: To establish an international consensus on the definition of primary colon cancer segment locations. DESIGN: Between December 2022 and June 2023, the Delphi survey study was conducted to seek opinions from relevant international experts and eventually develop a consensus definition of each colon cancer segment. SETTING: Three-round online-based Delphi survey study. INTERVENTIONS: The online survey included 17 questions. In the first 2 rounds, participating experts were asked to rank each statement on a scale of 1 (least relevant) to 9 (most relevant). Consensus statements and definitions were revised according to the results for statements obtaining a consensus score of 7 to 9. During the third round and online meeting, definitions and statements that reached a moderate or high consensus (above 4 for more than 70% of participants) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary goal of our project was focused on precisely localizing the specific segment affected by primary colon cancer rather than identifying surgical treatment or type of resection needed for a particular segment. RESULTS: The first round included 331 experts; 301 (91%) completed the second round and 295 (98%) completed the final round. Experts strongly supported the use of a “10-cm rule” to describe colon cancer sites at the flexures and anatomical landmarks for other segments. Regarding the definition of rectosigmoid cancer, experts from United States and Europe reached a high consensus that the term rectosigmoid as a colon cancer location must be abolished in contrast to experts from Asia. The description of overlapping segments of cancers achieved a consensus of 64%. LIMITATIONS: Subjective decisions are based on individual expert clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey, the first internationally conducted consensus study, achieved a remarkable level of consensus among a panel of global experts. Ambiguity still exists regarding overlapping lesions. See Video Abstract. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Source

Publisher

Lippincott Williams And Wilkins

Subject

Citation

Has Part

Source

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1097/DCR.0000000000003739

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details