Publication:
In-hospital venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism after major urologic cancer surgery

dc.contributor.coauthorGarcia, Cristina Cano
dc.contributor.coauthorTappero, Stefano
dc.contributor.coauthorPiccinelli, Mattia Luca
dc.contributor.coauthorBarletta, Francesco
dc.contributor.coauthorIncesu, Reha-Baris
dc.contributor.coauthorMorra, Simone
dc.contributor.coauthorScheipner, Lukas
dc.contributor.coauthorBaudo, Andrea
dc.contributor.coauthorTian, Zhe
dc.contributor.coauthorHoeh, Benedikt
dc.contributor.coauthorChierigo, Francesco
dc.contributor.coauthorSorce, Gabriele
dc.contributor.coauthorSaad, Fred
dc.contributor.coauthorShariat, Shahrokh F.
dc.contributor.coauthorCarmignani, Luca
dc.contributor.coauthorAhyai, Sascha
dc.contributor.coauthorLongo, Nicola
dc.contributor.coauthorBriganti, Alberto
dc.contributor.coauthorDe Cobell, Ottavio
dc.contributor.coauthorDell'Oglio, Paolo
dc.contributor.coauthorMandel, Philipp
dc.contributor.coauthorTerrone, Carlo
dc.contributor.coauthorChun, Felix K. H.
dc.contributor.coauthorKarakiewicz, Pierre I.
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:41:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to test for temporal trends of in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after major urologic cancer surgery (MUCS). Methods: In the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (2010-2019), this study identified non-metastatic radical cystectomy (RC), radical prostatectomy (RP), radical nephrectomy (RN), and partial nephrectomy (PN) patients. Temporal trends of VTE and PE and multivariable logistic regression analyses (MLR) addressing VTE or PE, and mortality with VTE or PE were performed. Results: Of 196,915 patients, 1180 (1.0%) exhibited VTE and 583 (0.3%) exhibited PE. The VTE rates increased from 0.6 to 0.7% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] + 4.0%; p = 0.01). Conversely, the PE rates decreased from 0.4 to 0.2% (EAPC - 4.5%; p = 0.01). No difference was observed in mortality with VTE (EAPC - 2.1%; p = 0.7) or with PE (EAPC - 1.2%; p = 0.8). In MLR relative to RP, RC (odds ratio [OR] 5.1), RN (OR 4.5), and PN (OR 3.6) were associated with higher VTE risk (all p < 0.001). Similarly in MLR relative to RP, RC (OR 4.6), RN (OR 3.3), and PN (OR 3.9) were associated with higher PE risk (all p < 0.001). In MLR, the risk of mortality was higher when VTE or PE was present in RC (VTE: OR 3.7, PE: OR 4.8; both p < 0.001) and RN (VTE: OR 5.2, PE: OR 8.3; both p < 0.001). Conclusions: RC, RN, and PN predisposes to a higher VTE and PE rates than RP. Moreover, among RC and RN patients with either VTE or PE, mortality is substantially higher than among their VTE or PE-free counterparts.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue13
dc.description.openaccesshybrid, Green Published
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsCristina Cano Garcia was awarded a scholarship by STIFTUNG GIERSCH.
dc.description.volume30
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-023-14246-0
dc.identifier.eissn1534-4681
dc.identifier.issn1068-9265
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171421277
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14246-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23490
dc.identifier.wos1070899700001
dc.keywordsRisk-factors
dc.keywordsThromboprophylaxis
dc.keywordsGuideline
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.grantnoCristina Cano Garcia was awarded a scholarship by STIFTUNG GIERSCH.
dc.relation.grantnoSTIFTUNG GIERSCH
dc.sourceAnnals of Surgical Oncology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleIn-hospital venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism after major urologic cancer surgery
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya

Files