Publication:
Can endometrial compaction predict live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles? a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.kuauthorTürkgeldi, Engin
dc.contributor.kuauthorYıldız, Şule
dc.contributor.kuauthorKalafat, Erkan
dc.contributor.kuauthorKeleş, İpek
dc.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.kuauthorBozdağ, Gürkan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:38:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Endometrial compaction (EC) is defined as the difference in endometrial thickness from the end of the follicular phase to the day of embryo transfer (ET). We aimed to determine the role of EC in predicting assisted reproductive technology (ART) success by conducting a meta-analysis of studies reporting the association between EC and clinical outcomes of ART. Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched from the date of inception to May 19, 2023. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR) per ET. Secondary outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy per ET, ongoing pregnancy per ET, clinical pregnancy per ET, and miscarriage per clinical pregnancy. Results:Fifteen studies were included. When data from all studies reporting live birth were pooled, overall LBR rates were comparable in cycles showing EC or not [RR = 0.97, 95%CI = 0.92 to 1.02;10 studies, 11,710 transfer cycles]. In a subgroup of studies that included euploid ET cycles, a similar LBR for patients with and without EC was noted [RR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.86 to 1.13, 4 studies, 1172 cycles]. The miscarriage rate did not seem to be affected by the presence or absence of EC [RR = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.90 to 1.24;12 studies]. Conclusion: The predictive value of EC in determining LBR is limited, and assessment of EC may no longer be necessary, given these findings. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42023410389
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsWe want to thank Jaimin S. Shah MD, Laura E. Dodge Sc.D./MPH, and their team for kindly sharing their data upon request.
dc.description.volume40
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10815-023-02942-5
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7330
dc.identifier.issn1058-0468
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171477372
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02942-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/22634
dc.identifier.wos1067160800001
dc.keywordsEndometrial compaction
dc.keywordsEndometrial thickness
dc.keywordsIn vitro fertilization
dc.keywordsLive birth
dc.keywordsAssisted reproduction
dc.keywordsEmbryo transfer
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer/Plenum Publishers
dc.relation.grantnoWe want to thank Jaimin S. Shah MD, Laura E. Dodge Sc.D./MPH, and their team for kindly sharing their data upon request.
dc.sourceJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
dc.subjectGenetics and heredity
dc.subjectObstetrics and gynecology
dc.subjectReproductive biology
dc.titleCan endometrial compaction predict live birth rates in assisted reproductive technology cycles? a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTürkgeldi, Engin
local.contributor.kuauthorYıldız, Şule
local.contributor.kuauthorKalafat, Erkan
local.contributor.kuauthorKeleş, İpek
local.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
local.contributor.kuauthorBozdağ, Gürkan

Files