Publication:
Non-invasive diagnostic criteria of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of updated LI-RADS with clinical practice guidelines of OPTN-UNOS, AASLD, NCCN, EASL-EORTC, and KLSCG-NCC

dc.contributor.coauthorMeier, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.coauthorClark, Toshimasa J.T.
dc.contributor.coauthorKaplan, Jeffrey
dc.contributor.coauthorLambert, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.coauthorChang, Samuel
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorErkan, Burcu
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T12:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractPurpose: to retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of different noninvasive diagnostic criteria of HCC including LI-RADS, OPTN-UNOS, AASLD, NCCN, EASL-EORTC, KLCSG-NCC. Materials and methods: we reviewed the medical records of 3,491 pathologically examined liver lesions from January-2011 to January-2015 in our institution. 195 lesions in 133 patients (M:F = 100:33) with chronic hepatitis B/C and/or cirrhosis for any etiology were finally included in our study, with 98 lesions ≥ 2 cm, 72 lesions between 1–2 cm, and 25 lesions < 1 cm. The main comparison was made with the largest nodules of each patient (n = 133). The lesions were retrospectively evaluated for the diagnosis of HCC on DCE-CT or MR using different noninvasive diagnostic criteria including LI-RADS, OPTN-UNOS, AASLD, NCCN, EASL-EORTC, and KLCSG-NCC. With pathological evaluation serving as a gold-standard, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV as well as accuracy of the diagnostic criteria were calculated. Results: there was no statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy among noninvasive diagnostic criteria. For 133 lesions of the largest lesion per patient, the overall accuracy was highest with LI-RADS criteria (89.3%) and the overall sensitivity was highest with LI-RADS, AASLD, NCCN criteria (all 89.5%). For 1–2 cm lesions, sensitivity decreased for all criteria in the following order: EASL-EORTC (59.1%), KLCSG-NCC (58.3%), LI-RADS, AASLD, NCCN (all 56.5%), and OPTN-UNOS (22.7%) criteria. OPTN-UNOS had the highest specificity in cirrhotic livers, 91.7%. Conclusions: the current noninvasive diagnostic criteria of HCC have no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy. Overall, LI-RADS had the highest sensitivity and accuracy among the guidelines. OPTN had the highest specificity for cirrhotic livers.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipN/A
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0226291
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR02011
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85076136086
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226291
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS One
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/8635
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleNon-invasive diagnostic criteria of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of updated LI-RADS with clinical practice guidelines of OPTN-UNOS, AASLD, NCCN, EASL-EORTC, and KLSCG-NCC
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorErkan, Burcu
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
8635.pdf
Size:
512.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format