Publication:
Bidirectional barbed only vs poliglecaprone suture with rhabdosphincter reconstruction for urethrovesical anastomosis during robotic radical prostatectomy: does it make any difference?

dc.contributor.coauthorCakici, Ozer Ural
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorCanda, Abdullah Erdem
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We investigated the use of bidirectional barbed suture only vs poliglecaprone suture with posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction for urethrovesical anastomosis (UVA) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on cystographic leakage, duration of catheterization, and early urinary continence. Materials and Methods: Bidirectional double-armed barbed suture only was used for UVA (n=50) in Group 1. Two 3/0 poliglecaprone 25 sutures were tied to each other to form a double-armed suture used for UVA with posterior rhabdosphincter reconstruction in Group 2 (n=50). Groups were similar regarding patient demographics and operative parameters. Groups were compared regarding leakage on cystography, duration of urethral catheterization after RARP, immediate urinary continence (continence at the time of urethral catheter removal), and continence rates at first and third-month follow-up. Results: Leakage on cystography was detected in 4 (8%) and 10 (20%) of the patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.08). Urinary catheter removal duration was 7.8 and 8.5 days in Group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.1). Immediate urinary continence was achieved in 38 (76%) and 20 (40%) of the patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.002). Urinary continence in first-month follow-up was achieved in 46 (92%) and 38 (76%) of the patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.02). Urinary continence in third-month follow-up was achieved in 48 (96%) and 47 (94%) of the patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.64). Mean UVA time was 16.8 and 21.2 minutes, respectively, in Group 1 and 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: Because of our experience, use of a barbed suture for UVA during RARP seems to lead to better immediate and early (first month) urinary continence rates and a shorter UVA time.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume32
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2018.0386
dc.identifier.eissn1557-900X
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85055078616
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0386
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9702
dc.identifier.wos447610600011
dc.keywordsRobotic radical prostatectomy
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsRobotic prostatectomy
dc.keywordsBarbed suture
dc.keywordsUrethrovesical anastomosis vesicourethral anastomosis
dc.keywordsAssisted prostatectomy
dc.keywordsEarly outcomes
dc.keywordsDorsal vein
dc.keywordsPolyglyconate
dc.keywordsFeasibility
dc.keywordsTrial
dc.keywordsTime
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endourology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.titleBidirectional barbed only vs poliglecaprone suture with rhabdosphincter reconstruction for urethrovesical anastomosis during robotic radical prostatectomy: does it make any difference?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorCanda, Abdullah Erdem
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files