Publication:
Is it possible to discriminate pulmonary carcinoids from hamartomas based on CT features?

dc.contributor.coauthorCoruh, Aysegul Gursoy
dc.contributor.coauthorKul, Melahat
dc.contributor.coauthorOz, Digdem Kuru
dc.contributor.coauthorYenigun, Bulent
dc.contributor.coauthorErsoz, Cevriye Cansiz
dc.contributor.coauthorAtes, Funda Ozalp
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorAtasoy, Kayhan Çetin
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.contributor.yokid189220
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the computed tomography (CT) features might be used in distinguishing pulmonary carcinoids from hamartomas. Materials and methods: Ninety solid pulmonary nodules (43 carcinoids and 47 hamartomas) in 90 patients were evaluated. The following CT scan features were evaluated: size, location (peripheral/central), contour (lobulated/nodular), number of lobulation, attenuation, calcification, endobronchial status, bronchial extension and involvement, parenchymal abnormalities distal to the lesion e.g. hyperlucency, atelectasis, and nodularity. The final pathologic diagnosis of the lesions and bronchial extension were confirmed by review of histopathological specimens. Results: Out of 43 carcinoids, 37 (86%) were typical. Twenty-three carcinoids and four hamartomas were central (p < 0.001). Ten carcinoids and one hamartoma were endobronchial. The majority of tumors had lobulated contours (65% of carcinoids, 44% of hamartomas) and carcinoids tended to have more lobulations (p = 0.052). Distal nodularity (p = 0.001), distal hyperlucency (p < 0.001), and atelectasis (p = 0.005) were significantly more common in carcinoids. Carcinoids had significantly more bronchial extension and involvement (p < 0.001; respectively). In addition, a new sign that we call "bronchial triangle sign" differentiated carcinoids with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.9% (95% CI: 69,1%-93.4%) and 91% (95% CI: 79.7%-96.6%). Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study on discrimination of carcinoids and hamartomas. A new CT sign called "bronchial triangle sign" might be used to differentiate carcinoids from hamartomas. Distal parenchymal abnormalities are more common in carcinoids than in hamartomas.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume62
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.001
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4499
dc.identifier.issn0899-7071
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079290618
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8945
dc.identifier.wos524352300008
dc.keywordsPulmonary carcinoid
dc.keywordsHamartoma
dc.keywordsCT
dc.keywordsDifferentiation computed-tomography
dc.keywordsTumors
dc.keywordsNodules
dc.keywordsLung
dc.keywordsArchives
dc.keywordsAFIP
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.sourceClinical Imaging
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectNuclear medicine
dc.subjectMedical imaging
dc.titleIs it possible to discriminate pulmonary carcinoids from hamartomas based on CT features?
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0000-0000-0022
local.contributor.kuauthorAtasoy, Kayhan Çetin

Files