Two majority voting classifiers applied to heart disease prediction

dc.contributor.authorid0000-0002-1252-7593
dc.contributor.coauthorMaras, Hadi Hakan
dc.contributor.coauthorTokdemir, Gul
dc.contributor.coauthorErgezer, Halit
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorKaradeniz, Talha
dc.contributor.kuprofileResearcher
dc.contributor.researchcenterKoç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM) / Koç Üniversitesi Translasyonel Tıp Araştırma Merkezi (KUTTAM)
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:32:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractTwo novel methods for heart disease prediction, which use the kurtosis of the features and the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, are presented. A Majority Voting approach is applied, and two base classifiers are derived through statistical weight calculation. First, exploitation of attribute kurtosis and attribute Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS test) result is done by plugging the base categorizer into a Bagging Classifier. Second, fitting Maxwell random variables to the components and summating KS statistics are used for weight assignment. We have compared state-of-the-art methods to the proposed classifiers and reported the results. According to the findings, our Gaussian distribution and kurtosis-based Majority Voting Bagging Classifier (GKMVB) and Maxwell Distribution-based Majority Voting Bagging Classifier (MKMVB) outperform SVM, ANN, and Naive Bayes algorithms. In this context, which also indicates, especially when we consider that the KS test and kurtosis hack is intuitive, that the proposed routine is promising. Following the state-of-the-art, the experiments were conducted on two well-known datasets of Heart Disease Prediction, namely Statlog, and Spectf. A comparison of Optimized Precision is made to prove the effectiveness of the methods: the newly proposed methods attained 85.6 and 81.0 for Statlog and Spectf, respectively (while the state of the heart attained 83.5 and 71.6, respectively). We claim that the Majority Voting family of classifiers is still open to new developments through appropriate weight assignment. This claim is obvious, especially when its simple structure is fused with the Ensemble Methods' generalization ability and success.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessgold
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume13
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app13063767
dc.identifier.eissn2076-3417
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85151521094
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app13063767
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26359
dc.identifier.wos957375400001
dc.keywordsMajority voting classifier
dc.keywordsKurtosis
dc.keywordsGaussian distribution
dc.keywordsBagging classifier
dc.keywordsEnsemble methods
dc.keywordsHeart disease prediction
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.sourceApplied Sciences-Basel
dc.subjectChemistry
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleTwo majority voting classifiers applied to heart disease prediction
dc.typeJournal Article

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR05638.pdf
Size:
398.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format