Recognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries

dc.contributor.coauthorNys, Evelien
dc.contributor.coauthorPauwels, Sara
dc.contributor.coauthorAdam, Balazs
dc.contributor.coauthorAmaro, Joao
dc.contributor.coauthorAthanasiou, Athanasios
dc.contributor.coauthorBashkin, Osnat
dc.contributor.coauthorBric, Tatjana Kofol
dc.contributor.coauthorBulat, Petar
dc.contributor.coauthorCaglayan, Cigdem
dc.contributor.coauthorCanu, Irina Guseva
dc.contributor.coauthorCebanu, Serghei
dc.contributor.coauthorCharbotel, Barbara
dc.contributor.coauthorCirule, Jolanta
dc.contributor.coauthorCurti, Stefania
dc.contributor.coauthorDavidovitch, Nadav
dc.contributor.coauthorDopelt, Keren
dc.contributor.coauthorFikfak, Metoda Dodic
dc.contributor.coauthorFrilander, Heikki
dc.contributor.coauthorGustavsson, Per
dc.contributor.coauthorHoeper, Anje Christina
dc.contributor.coauthorKiran, Sibel
dc.contributor.coauthorKogevinas, Manolis
dc.contributor.coauthorKudasz, Ferenc
dc.contributor.coauthorKolstad, Henrik A.
dc.contributor.coauthorLazarevic, Sanja Brekalo
dc.contributor.coauthorMacan, Jelena
dc.contributor.coauthorMajery, Nicole
dc.contributor.coauthorMarinaccio, Alessandro
dc.contributor.coauthorMates, Dana
dc.contributor.coauthorMattioli, Stefano
dc.contributor.coauthorMcelvenny, Damien Martin
dc.contributor.coauthorMediouni, Zakia
dc.contributor.coauthorMehlum, Ingrid Sivesind
dc.contributor.coauthorMerisalu, Eda
dc.contributor.coauthorMijakoski, Dragan
dc.contributor.coauthorNena, Evangelia
dc.contributor.coauthorNoone, Peter
dc.contributor.coauthorOtelea, Marina Ruxandra
dc.contributor.coauthorPelclova, Daniela
dc.contributor.coauthorPranjic, Nurka
dc.contributor.coauthorRosso, Mark
dc.contributor.coauthorSerra, Consol
dc.contributor.coauthorRushton, Lesley
dc.contributor.coauthorSandal, Abdulsamet
dc.contributor.coauthorSchernhammer, Eva S.
dc.contributor.coauthorStoleski, Sasho
dc.contributor.coauthorTurner, Michelle C.
dc.contributor.coauthorvan der Molen, Henk F.
dc.contributor.coauthorVarga, Marek
dc.contributor.coauthorWalusiak-Skorupa, Jolanta
dc.contributor.coauthorStraif, Kurt
dc.contributor.coauthorGodderis, Lode
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorKıran, Sibel
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid29451
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThis study aims to present an overview of the formal recognition of COVID-19 as occupational disease (OD) or injury (OI) across Europe.MethodsA COVID-19 questionnaire was designed by a task group within COST-funded OMEGA-NET and sent to occupational health experts of 37 countries in WHO European region, with a last update in April 2022.ResultsThe questionnaire was filled out by experts from 35 countries. There are large differences between national systems regarding the recognition of OD and OI: 40% of countries have a list system, 57% a mixed system and one country an open system. In most countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as an OD (57%). In four countries, COVID-19 can be recognised as OI (11%) and in seven countries as either OD or OI (20%). In two countries, there is no recognition possible to date. Thirty-two countries (91%) recognise COVID-19 as OD/OI among healthcare workers. Working in certain jobs is considered proof of occupational exposure in 25 countries, contact with a colleague with confirmed infection in 19 countries, and contact with clients with confirmed infection in 21 countries. In most countries (57%), a positive PCR test is considered proof of disease. The three most common compensation benefits for COVID-19 as OI/OD are disability pension, treatment and rehabilitation. Long COVID is included in 26 countries.ConclusionsCOVID-19 can be recognised as OD or OI in 94% of the European countries completing this survey, across different social security and embedded occupational health systems.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.openaccessBronze
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsThis publication is based on work from COST Action CA16216 (OMEGA-NET), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).
dc.description.volume80
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/oemed-2022-108726
dc.identifier.eissn1470-7926
dc.identifier.issn1351-0711
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177989808
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2022-108726
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26432
dc.identifier.wos1108512700001
dc.keywordsCovid-19
dc.keywordsEurope
dc.keywordsHumans
dc.keywordsOccupational diseases
dc.keywordsOccupational exposure
dc.keywordsOccupations
dc.keywordsPost-acute Covid-19 syndrome
dc.languageen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.grantnoCOST Action [CA16216]; COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)
dc.sourceOccupational and Environmental Medicine
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleRecognition of COVID-19 with occupational origin: a comparison between European countries
dc.typeJournal Article

Files