Publication: The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper-responders in in vitro fertilization
dc.contributor.coauthor | Feferkorn, I. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Santos-Ribeiro, S. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Ubaldi, F. M. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Velasco, J. G. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Blockeel, C. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Conforti, A. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Esteves, S. C. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Fatemi, H. M. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Gianaroli, L. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Grynberg, M. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Humaidan, P. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Lainas, G. T. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | La Marca, A. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | LaTasha, C. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Lathi, R. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Norman, R. J. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Orvieto, R. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Paulson, R. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Pellicer, A. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Polyzos, N. P. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Roque, M. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Sunkara, S. K. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Tan, S. L. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Venetis, C. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Weissman, A. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Yarali, H. | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Dahan, M. H. | |
dc.contributor.department | School of Medicine | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Ata, Mustafa Barış | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Urman, Cumhur Bülent | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-19T10:28:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose To provide agreed-upon guidelines on the management of a hyper-responsive patient undergoing ovarian stimulation (OS). Methods A literature search was performed regarding the management of hyper-response to OS for assisted reproductive technology. A scientific committee consisting of 4 experts discussed, amended, and selected the final statements. A priori, it was decided that consensus would be reached when & GE;66% of the participants agreed, and & LE;3 rounds would be used to obtain this consensus. A total of 28/31 experts responded (selected for global coverage), anonymous to each other.Results A total of 26/28 statements reached consensus. The most relevant are summarized here. The target number of oocytes to be collected in a stimulation cycle for IVF in an anticipated hyper-responder is 15-19 (89.3% consensus). For a potential hyper-responder, it is preferable to achieve a hyper-response and freeze all than aim for a fresh transfer (71.4% consensus). GnRH agonists should be avoided for pituitary suppression in anticipated hyper-responders performing IVF (96.4% consensus). The preferred starting dose in the first IVF stimulation cycle of an anticipated hyper-responder of average weight is 150 IU/day (82.1% consensus). ICoasting in order to decrease the risk of OHSS should not be used (89.7% consensus). Metformin should be added before/during ovarian stimulation to anticipated hyper-responders only if the patient has PCOS and is insulin resistant (82.1% consensus). In the case of a hyper-response, a dopaminergic agent should be used only if hCG will be used as a trigger (including dual/double trigger) with or without a fresh transfer (67.9% consensus). After using a GnRH agonist trigger due to a perceived risk of OHSS, luteal phase rescue with hCG and an attempt of a fresh transfer is discouraged regardless of the number of oocytes collected (72.4% consensus). The choice of the FET protocol is not influenced by the fact that the patient is a hyper-responder (82.8% consensus). In the cases of freeze all due to OHSS risk, a FET cycle can be performed in the immediate first menstrual cycle (92.9% consensus).Conclusion These guidelines for the management of hyper-response can be useful for tailoring patient care and for harmonizing future research. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WOS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.indexedby | PubMed | |
dc.description.issue | 11 | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | N/A | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Hera was the goddess of women, marriage, family, and childbirth in ancient Greek mythology and, as such, was felt to make a fitting title for a woman with hyper-response. | |
dc.description.volume | 40 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10815-023-02918-5 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-7330 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1058-0468 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85171340657 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02918-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/25711 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 1067547900002 | |
dc.keywords | Hyper-response | |
dc.keywords | Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome | |
dc.keywords | Ovarian stimulation | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Springer/Plenum Publishers | |
dc.relation.grantno | Hera was the goddess of women, marriage, family, and childbirth in ancient Greek mythology and, as such, was felt to make a fitting title for a woman with hyper-response.; goddess of women, marriage, family, and childbirth in ancient Greek mythology | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | |
dc.subject | Genetics and heredity | |
dc.subject | Obstetrics and gynecology | |
dc.subject | Reproductive biology | |
dc.title | The HERA (Hyper-response Risk Assessment) Delphi consensus for the management of hyper-responders in in vitro fertilization | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.publication.orgunit1 | SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | |
local.publication.orgunit2 | School of Medicine | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | d02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | d02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd | |
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication | 17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e | |
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e |