Publication:
Primary care service usage according to the type of family health centers: analysis of the Turkish data of the QUALICOPC study

dc.contributor.coauthorTuzun, Sabah
dc.contributor.coauthorAkman, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorDabak, Resat
dc.contributor.coauthorSargin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorUnluoglu, Ilhami
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorSakarya, Sibel
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:31:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAim: Family health centers (FHCs) are reimbursed for their current expenditures based on a classification of four clusters in Turkey. This study compared the coordination, comprehensiveness, continuity, accessibility, and the first contact of care among different reimbursement FHC groups.Methods: The data were obtained from the Turkish data of the Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe study. Data was collected in provinces from six geographical regions. Physicians and patients from Classes A and B FHCs were called the first group, and others were called the second group.Results: A total of 296 physicians and 2623 patients were enrolled. According to the reimbursement groups, 593 (22.6%) patients received services from the first group and 2012 (77.4%) patients from the second group. The first contact with care and the admission frequency of 3 or more in the last six months were higher in the first group (respectively, 99.2% vs. 97.7%, p=0.027; 55.4% vs. 49.6%, p=0.015).Conclusion: The reimbursement classification did not make a difference in coordination, comprehensive care, continuity, accessibility, and being the first contact of care. Therefore, the current classification does not contribute to improving the quality of primary care in terms of service provision.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessgold
dc.description.publisherscopeNational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume61
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/haseki.galenos.2023.8757
dc.identifier.eissn2147-2688
dc.identifier.issn1302-0072
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85153355553
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2023.8757
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26307
dc.identifier.wos964288500001
dc.keywordsFamily practices
dc.keywordsOrganization and administration
dc.keywordsComprehensive healthcare
dc.keywordsContinuity of care
dc.keywordsHealth services administration
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherGalenos Publ House
dc.relation.ispartofHaseki Tıp Bülteni-Medical Bulletin of Haseki
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titlePrimary care service usage according to the type of family health centers: analysis of the Turkish data of the QUALICOPC study
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorSakarya, Sibel
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR05469.pdf
Size:
655.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format