Trust my gesture or my word: how do listeners choose the information channel during communication?

dc.contributor.authorid0000-0002-2465-360X
dc.contributor.authorid0000-0002-0190-7988
dc.contributor.coauthorNg, Francis
dc.contributor.coauthorNozari, Nazbanou
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorArslan, Burcu
dc.contributor.kuauthorGöksun, Tilbe
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokid47278
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:28:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractInformation can be conveyed via multiple channels such as verbal and gestural (visual) channels during communication. Sometimes the information from different channels does not match (e.g., saying right while pointing to the left). How do addressees choose which information to act upon in such cases? In two experiments, we investigated this issue by having participants follow instructions on how to move objects on the screen. Experiment 1 examined whether people's choice of channel can be altered by feedback favoring either the verbal or the gestural channel. In Experiment 2, there was no feedback and participants were free to choose either channel. We also assessed participants' verbal and visuospatial working memory capacities. Results showed that, when faced with contradicting information, there is a natural bias at the group level toward relying on the verbal channel, although this bias can be temporarily altered by probabilistic feedback. Moreover, when labels were shorter and of higher frequency, participants relied more on the verbal channel. In the absence of feedback, the capacity of individuals' visual, but not verbal, working memory determined reliance on one channel versus the other. Collectively, these results show that information selection in communication is influenced by group-level biases, as well as the properties of items and characteristics of individuals.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsorsThis research was partially funded by the James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award in Understanding Human Cognition #220020510 to TilbeGoeksun.
dc.description.volume50
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xlm0001253
dc.identifier.eissn1939-1285
dc.identifier.issn0278-7393
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166909505
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001253
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/25695
dc.identifier.wos982272100001
dc.keywordsGesture comprehension
dc.keywordsGesture-speech incongruency
dc.keywordsWorking memory
dc.keywordsCommunication
dc.keywordsInformation processing
dc.languageen
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association
dc.relation.grantnoJames S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award in Understanding Human Cognition [220020510]
dc.sourceJournal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectPsychology, experimental
dc.titleTrust my gesture or my word: how do listeners choose the information channel during communication?
dc.typeJournal Article

Files