The heat is on: the impact of excessive temperature increments on complications of laser treatment for ureteral and renal stones

dc.contributor.authorid0000-0001-6534-5403
dc.contributor.coauthorTonyali, Senol
dc.contributor.coauthorvon Bargen, Maximilian Ferry
dc.contributor.coauthorMiernik, Arkadiusz
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzkan, Arif
dc.contributor.kuprofileDoctor
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteN/A
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.contributor.yokid289255
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: Technological advancements in the field of urology have led to a paradigm shift in the management of urolithiasis towards minimally invasive endourological interventions, namely ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, concerns regarding the potential for thermal injury during laser lithotripsy have arisen, as studies have indicated that the threshold for cellular thermal injury (43 °C) can be exceeded, even with conventional low-power laser settings. This review aims to identify the factors that contribute to temperature increments during laser treatment using current laser systems and evaluate their impact on patient outcomes. Materials and methods: To select studies for inclusion, a search was performed on online databases including PubMed and Google Scholar. Keywords such as 'temperature' or 'heat' were combined with 'lithotripsy', 'nephrolithotomy', 'ureteroscopy', or 'retrograde intrarenal surgery', both individually and in various combinations. Results: Various strategies have been proposed to mitigate temperature rise, such as reducing laser energy or frequency, shortening the duration of laser activation, increasing the irrigation fluid flow rate, and using room temperature or chilled water for irrigation. It is important to note that higher irrigation fluid flow rates should be approached cautiously due to potential increases in intrarenal pressure and associated infectious complications. The utilization of a ureteral access sheath (UAS) may offer benefits by facilitating irrigation fluid outflow, thereby reducing intrapelvic pressure and intrarenal fluid temperature. Conclusion: Achieving a balance between laser power, duration of laser activation, and irrigation fluid rate and temperature appears to be crucial for urologists to minimize excessive temperature rise. © 2023, The Author(s).
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.openaccessAll Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-023-04652-0
dc.identifier.eissn1433-8726
dc.identifier.issn7244983
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85177800241
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04652-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26612
dc.identifier.wos1126702900018
dc.keywordsEndourology
dc.keywordsLaser lithotripsy
dc.keywordsThermal injury
dc.keywordsUrolithiasis
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland Gmbh
dc.sourceWorld Journal of Urology
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.titleThe heat is on: the impact of excessive temperature increments on complications of laser treatment for ureteral and renal stones
dc.typeJournal Article

Files