Publication:
Factorial structure of autobiographical recollection assessed by a Turkish version of Autobiographical Recollection Test (ART)

dc.contributor.coauthorAytürk, Ezgi
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.kuauthorGülgöz, Sami
dc.contributor.kuauthorUsta, Berivan Ece
dc.contributor.kuauthorGöktaş, Nilüfer
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:30:23Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAutobiographical Recollection Test (ART; Berntsen et al., Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8:305–318, 2019) is a self-report measure of individual differences in autobiographical recollection that comprises seven highly correlated subdimensions. In Study 1 (N = 357), we investigated the degree to which these subdimensions are independent by examining the second-order factor and bifactor models of scores from Turkish translation of ART. Results showed that ART scores are best represented with an incomplete bifactor model in which a strong general factor captures autobiographical recollection experience in general, and three specific factors capture additional individual differences in Reliving, Rehearsal, and Life-story relevance. Vividness, Coherence, Scene, and Visual imagery dimensions did not capture any unique information above and beyond the general factor. In Study 14, we cross-validated the incomplete bifactor model of ART on a separate sample of participants (N = 359). In Study 18 (N = 524) we examined the relations of the general factors and Reliving, Rehearsal, and Life-story relevance specific factors with episodic memory and depression scores. The general factor was positively, and the three specific factors were negatively associated with episodic memory. The general factor and the specific factors of Reliving and Life-story relevance were not associated with depression, whereas the specific factor Rehearsal was positively associated with depression. We discussed the results and suggested strategies for the proper use and interpretation of ART scores in autobiographical memory research.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue13
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume42
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12144-021-02388-x
dc.identifier.issn1046-1310
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85117030169
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02388-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26051
dc.identifier.wos707953300001
dc.keywordsAutobiographical memory
dc.keywordsAutobiographical memory scales
dc.keywordsAutobiographical recollection
dc.keywordsBifactor models
dc.keywordsIndividual differences
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Psychology
dc.subjectPsychology, multidisciplinary
dc.titleFactorial structure of autobiographical recollection assessed by a Turkish version of Autobiographical Recollection Test (ART)
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorUsta, Berivan Ece
local.contributor.kuauthorGülgöz, Sami
local.contributor.kuauthorGöktaş, Nilüfer
local.publication.orgunit1College of Social Sciences and Humanities
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Psychology
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794

Files