Publication:
Acute effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on photoparoxysmal response

dc.contributor.coauthorErol, Tulay Yalmaz
dc.contributor.coauthorKaya, Irem Ilgezdi
dc.contributor.coauthorOzcelik, Emel Ur
dc.contributor.coauthorAksu, Serkan
dc.contributor.coauthorSirin, Nermin Gorkem
dc.contributor.coauthorBebek, Nerses
dc.contributor.coauthorKaramursel, Sacit
dc.contributor.coauthorBaykan, Betul
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Physics
dc.contributor.kuauthorKurt, Adnan
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Sciences
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:32:52Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, used to modify the excitability of the central nervous system. The main mechanism of tDCS is to change the excitability by subthreshold modulation by affecting neuronal membrane potentials in the direction of depolarization or repolarization. tDCS was previously investigated as an alternative adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy. We aimed here to investigate the acute effect of tDCS on the photoparoxysmal response (PPR) in EEG. Methods: We enrolled 11 consecutive patients diagnosed with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who had PPR on at least 2 EEGs. Three different procedures, including sham, anodal, and cathodal tDCS were applied to the patients at intervals of one week by placing the active electrode over Oz, for 2 mA, 20 minutes. Spike-wave indices (SWI) were counted by two researchers independently and were compared during intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) on EEGs both before and after the application. Results: After cathodal tDCS, SWI increased compared to baseline EEG and sham EEG in 3 patients, and after anodal tDCS, SWI increased in 2 patients. Although the SWI values did not change significantly, 8 patients reported subjectively that the applications were beneficial for them and that they experienced less discomfort during photic stimulation after the sessions. There were no side effects except transient skin rash in one patient, only. Conclusions: In our sham controlled tDCS study with both cathodal and anodal stimulation, our data showed that there was no significant change in SWI during IPS, despite subjective well-being. tDCS' modulatory effect does not seem to act in the acute phase on EEG parameters after photic stimulation.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipThe present work was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul University. Project No. TYL-2021-38068.
dc.description.volume201
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107320
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6844
dc.identifier.issn0920-1211
dc.identifier.quartileQ3
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186742916
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107320
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26487
dc.identifier.wos1195934100001
dc.keywordsElectroencephalography
dc.keywordsEpilepsy
dc.keywordsPhotosensitivity
dc.keywordsPhotoparoxysmal response
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.grantnoResearch Fund of Istanbul University [TYL-2021-38068]
dc.relation.ispartofEpilepsy Research
dc.subjectClinical Neurology
dc.titleAcute effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on photoparoxysmal response
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKurt, Adnan
local.publication.orgunit1College of Sciences
local.publication.orgunit2Department of Physics
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationc43d21f0-ae67-4f18-a338-bcaedd4b72a4
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryc43d21f0-ae67-4f18-a338-bcaedd4b72a4
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublicationaf0395b0-7219-4165-a909-7016fa30932d
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryaf0395b0-7219-4165-a909-7016fa30932d

Files