Publication:
Optimizing prostate biopsy: the role of targeted, regional, and systematic approaches

dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorTarım, Kayhan
dc.contributor.kuauthorBakbak, Haşim
dc.contributor.kuauthorSarıkaya, Ahmet Furkan
dc.contributor.kuauthorKöseoğlu, Ersin
dc.contributor.kuauthorMüdüroğlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.kuauthorKaraarslan, Umut Can
dc.contributor.kuauthorKanlı, Şevval
dc.contributor.kuauthorÖzkan, Arif
dc.contributor.kuauthorAykanat, İbrahim Can
dc.contributor.kuauthorEsen, Barış
dc.contributor.kuauthorKiremit, Murat Can
dc.contributor.kuauthorGürses, Bengi
dc.contributor.kuauthorÇil, Barbaros Erhan
dc.contributor.kuauthorCanda, Abdullah Erdem
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalbay, Mevlana Derya
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.kuauthorEsen, Tarık
dc.contributor.kuauthorKordan, Yakup
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T08:23:06Z
dc.date.available2025-12-31
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Recent studies suggest that the necessity and contribution of systematic biopsy (SB), where the entire prostate is sampled, are decreasing. The EAU has updated its guidelines, replacing the recommendation of targeted biopsy (TB) + SB with TB + regional biopsy (RB). This study aims to compare the detection rates of TB alone, TB + RB, and TB + SB combinations. Methods: 803 patients with a single lesion on mpMRI who underwent TB + SB between 2019 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent TB + SB, and each core was reported separately and grouped into categories as TB, TB + RB, TB + SB. Results: In PIRADS 3 and 5 lesions, TB alone performed similar to TB + SB in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (p = 0.063 and p = 0.5). In the PIRADS 4 group, TB’s sensitivity was 80.5% (p < 0.001). Among 23 PIRADS 4 patients where csPCa was detected by SB but missed by TB, the lesions were smaller in size (7.15 mm vs. 9.88 mm, p < 0.001). ROC analysis determined a cut-off value of 9.25 mm. In lesions < 9.25 mm, csPCa was detected in 59 patients, with TB detecting 39 of these (66.1%) (p < 0.001). TB + RB detected 56/59 (94.9%) csPCa in < 9.25 mm lesions (p = 0.125). For PIRADS 4 lesions ≥ 9.25 mm, csPCa was detected in 59 patients, with TB detecting 56 of these (94.9%) (p = 0.25). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the current recommendation of TB + RB may not be universally optimal and biopsy strategies can be individualized based on PIRADS score, location, and size.TB + RB is essential for optimizing csPCa detection in PIRADS 4 lesions < 9.25 mm. In contrast, TB alone may be adequate for PIRADS 4 lesions ≥ 9.25 mm, PIRADS 5 lesions, non–peripheral zone lesions, and lesions involving both hemiglands, without compromising csPCa detection. Furthermore, the addition of RB or SB to TB, increases the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CIPC) in PIRADS 3 lesions, PIRADS 4 lesions ≥ 9.25 mm, and non–peripheral zone lesions. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
dc.description.fulltextYes
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-025-06098-y
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed41324665
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105023541999
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-06098-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31696
dc.identifier.volume44
dc.identifier.wos001628858700001
dc.keywordsClinically significant prostate cancer
dc.keywordsMultiparametric MRI
dc.keywordsPIRADS
dc.keywordsProstate biopsy
dc.keywordsProstate cancer
dc.keywordsRegional biopsy
dc.keywordsTargeted biopsy
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Urology
dc.relation.openaccessYes
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectUrology & Nephrology
dc.titleOptimizing prostate biopsy: the role of targeted, regional, and systematic approaches
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.familyNameTarım
person.familyNameBakbak
person.familyNameSarıkaya
person.familyNameKöseoğlu
person.familyNameMüdüroğlu
person.familyNameKaraarslan
person.familyNameKanlı
person.familyNameÖzkan
person.familyNameAykanat
person.familyNameEsen
person.familyNameKiremit
person.familyNameGürses
person.familyNameÇil
person.familyNameCanda
person.familyNameBalbay
person.familyNameTilki
person.familyNameEsen
person.familyNameKordan
person.givenNameKayhan
person.givenNameHaşim
person.givenNameAhmet Furkan
person.givenNameErsin
person.givenNameMustafa
person.givenNameUmut Can
person.givenNameŞevval
person.givenNameArif
person.givenNameİbrahim Can
person.givenNameBarış
person.givenNameMurat Can
person.givenNameBengi
person.givenNameBarbaros Erhan
person.givenNameAbdullah Erdem
person.givenNameMevlana Derya
person.givenNameDerya
person.givenNameTarık
person.givenNameYakup
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files