Publication:
Optimizing prostate biopsy: the role of targeted, regional, and systematic approaches

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Tarim, Kayhan (57189991557)
Bakbak, Haşim (57983970000)
Sarikaya, Ahmet Furkan (57221672636)
Köseoǧlu, Ersin (55505798500)
Müdüroğlu, Mustafa (57201664855)
Karaarslan, Umut Can (57211521610)
Kanlı, Şevval (59546602000)
Özkan, A. (56347006600)
Aykanat, Ibrahim Can (57270500800)
Esen, Barış (56825557700)

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Recent studies suggest that the necessity and contribution of systematic biopsy (SB), where the entire prostate is sampled, are decreasing. The EAU has updated its guidelines, replacing the recommendation of targeted biopsy (TB) + SB with TB + regional biopsy (RB). This study aims to compare the detection rates of TB alone, TB + RB, and TB + SB combinations. Methods: 803 patients with a single lesion on mpMRI who underwent TB + SB between 2019 and 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent TB + SB, and each core was reported separately and grouped into categories as TB, TB + RB, TB + SB. Results: In PIRADS 3 and 5 lesions, TB alone performed similar to TB + SB in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (p = 0.063 and p = 0.5). In the PIRADS 4 group, TB’s sensitivity was 80.5% (p < 0.001). Among 23 PIRADS 4 patients where csPCa was detected by SB but missed by TB, the lesions were smaller in size (7.15 mm vs. 9.88 mm, p < 0.001). ROC analysis determined a cut-off value of 9.25 mm. In lesions < 9.25 mm, csPCa was detected in 59 patients, with TB detecting 39 of these (66.1%) (p < 0.001). TB + RB detected 56/59 (94.9%) csPCa in < 9.25 mm lesions (p = 0.125). For PIRADS 4 lesions ≥ 9.25 mm, csPCa was detected in 59 patients, with TB detecting 56 of these (94.9%) (p = 0.25). Conclusion: The findings suggest that the current recommendation of TB + RB may not be universally optimal and biopsy strategies can be individualized based on PIRADS score, location, and size.TB + RB is essential for optimizing csPCa detection in PIRADS 4 lesions < 9.25 mm. In contrast, TB alone may be adequate for PIRADS 4 lesions ≥ 9.25 mm, PIRADS 5 lesions, non–peripheral zone lesions, and lesions involving both hemiglands, without compromising csPCa detection. Furthermore, the addition of RB or SB to TB, increases the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer (CIPC) in PIRADS 3 lesions, PIRADS 4 lesions ≥ 9.25 mm, and non–peripheral zone lesions. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.

Source

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH

Subject

Citation

Has Part

Source

World Journal of Urology

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1007/s00345-025-06098-y

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)

Copyrights Note

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs)

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details