Publication:
Comparison of a TrachoSpray device and manual lidocaine spray on hemodynamic stability and postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing double-lumen tube intubation: a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.coauthorTümer, Murat
dc.contributor.coauthorGeyik, Fatih Doğu
dc.contributor.coauthorBuz, Mesut
dc.contributor.coauthorTaşkın, Kübra
dc.contributor.coauthorÇevik, Banu
dc.contributor.coauthorDemirhan, Recep
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorSöğüt, Muhammet Selman
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T07:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackgroundPostoperative sore throat (POST) is an distressing complication following endotracheal intubation, particularly with double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation. Study evaluated the effects of two local anesthetic techniques on hemodynamic responses and POST in DLT-intubated patients.MethodsA randomized controlled study was conducted with 60 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery. Participants were randomized into three groups: TrachoSpray group (2 mL of 10% lidocaine), Manual spray group (10% lidocaine) and, Control group (0.9% saline). Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were monitored preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. POST was assessed using a visual analog scale at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post-extubation.ResultsBoth lidocaine groups demonstrated significant reductions in SBP, DBP, and MAP at key time points compared to control group. Post-extubation, MAP was significantly higher in TrachoSpray group than lidocaine group (p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences in POST scores were observed between groups.ConclusionsTrachoSpray device and manual lidocaine spray improved hemodynamic stability in DLT-intubated patients
dc.description.abstracthowever, neither method resulted in a significant reduction in POST scores. Further research is needed to confirm these hemodynamic benefits and to explore potential effects on long-term outcomes.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessGreen Submitted, gold
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.versionPublished Version
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileQ1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08941939.2025.2586017
dc.identifier.eissn1521-0553
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn0894-1939
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pubmed41797600
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105032488465
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2025.2586017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/32982
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.wos001710006900001
dc.keywordsPostoperative sore throat
dc.keywordsDouble-lumen tube
dc.keywordsTrachoSpray
dc.keywordsAnesthesiology
dc.keywordsThoracic surgery
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Investigative Surgery
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.rights.uriN/A
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleComparison of a TrachoSpray device and manual lidocaine spray on hemodynamic stability and postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing double-lumen tube intubation: a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files