<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Comparison of a TrachoSpray device and manual lidocaine spray on hemodynamic stability and postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing double-lumen tube intubation: a randomized controlled trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Tümer, Murat

Geyik, Fatih Doğu

Buz, Mesut

Taşkın, Kübra

Çevik, Banu

Demirhan, Recep

Date

Language

eng

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

BackgroundPostoperative sore throat (POST) is an distressing complication following endotracheal intubation, particularly with double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation. Study evaluated the effects of two local anesthetic techniques on hemodynamic responses and POST in DLT-intubated patients.MethodsA randomized controlled study was conducted with 60 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery. Participants were randomized into three groups: TrachoSpray group (2 mL of 10% lidocaine), Manual spray group (10% lidocaine) and, Control group (0.9% saline). Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were monitored preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. POST was assessed using a visual analog scale at 2, 6, 12, and 24 h post-extubation.ResultsBoth lidocaine groups demonstrated significant reductions in SBP, DBP, and MAP at key time points compared to control group. Post-extubation, MAP was significantly higher in TrachoSpray group than lidocaine group (p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences in POST scores were observed between groups.ConclusionsTrachoSpray device and manual lidocaine spray improved hemodynamic stability in DLT-intubated patients
however, neither method resulted in a significant reduction in POST scores. Further research is needed to confirm these hemodynamic benefits and to explore potential effects on long-term outcomes.

Source

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Subject

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Journal of Investigative Surgery

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1080/08941939.2025.2586017

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
0
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators