Publication:
Eosinophilic cationic protein and D-Dimer are potential biomarkers to predict response to antihistamines but not to omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Atik, Ozge
Tepetam, Fatma Merve
Ozden, Seyma

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Introduction: Biomarkers that could reliably anticipate the effectiveness of antihistamines and omalizumab in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have not been conclusively identified. Our objective was to examine how eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, D-dimer, and total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) impact the response to antihistamine and omalizumab treatments in individuals with CSU. Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, CSU patients that had undergone treatment with either antihistamines or omalizumab for a minimum of 12 weeks between 2015 and 2021 at an Allergy and Immunology Department were analyzed. Several demographic and laboratory parameters including eosinophil counts, mean platelet vol and uuml;me (MPV), sedimentation, C-reactive protein (CRP), antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and Anti-thyroperoxidase (Anti-TPO) and total IgE, tryptase, ECP and D-dimer were retrived from patient files. The association of these biomarkers with Urticaria Control Test (UCT) and the effect of these biomarkers on treatment response were evaluated. Treatment response was assessed using the UCT, with a score of UCT >= 12 indicating a responder and UCT < 12 indicating a non responder. Results: The patients in the omalizumab group were older, had a longer disease duration and had worse urticaria control (lower baseline UCT scores). 421 patients were treated with antihistamines and 88 patients were treated with omalizumab. ECP was found to be inversely correlated with baseline UCT (p < 0.001 r=-0.268). ECP and D-dimer levels of non-responder patients in the antihistamine group were significantly higher than in responder patients (ECP: 49 ng/mL vs 28.1 ng/mL, p < 0.001) (D-dimer: 0.60 mg/L vs 0.30 mg/L, p < 0.001), while there were no significant difference in terms of tryptase and total IgE. These four biomarkers were similar, in omalizumab responders and non responders. Conclusion: In this study with CSU, we looked at predictors of responses to treatments. ECP can serve as a marker of poor urticaria control and may predict antihistamine refractoriness along with D-dimer.

Source

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

Subject

Medicine

Citation

Has Part

Source

Libyan Journal of Medicine

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1080/19932820.2024.2420483

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details