Publication:
Impact of age on long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Thumbnail Image

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Cano Garcia, Cristina
Wenzel, Mike
Humke, Clara
Wittler, Clarissa
Dislich, Julius
Incesu, Reha-Baris
Koellermann, Jens
Steuber, Thomas
Graefen, Markus
Tilki, Derya

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Aim and Objectives: We aimed to test the impact of age on long-term urinary continence (& GE;12 months) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods and Materials: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify the patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2014 and January 2021. Patients were divided into three age groups: age group one (& LE;60 years), age group two (61-69 years) and age group three (& GE;70 years). Multivariable logistic regression models tested the differences between the age groups in the analyses addressing long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results: Of the 201 prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, 49 (24%) were assigned to age group one (& LE;60 years), 93 (46%) to age group two (61-69 years) and 59 (29%) to age group three (& GE;70 years). The three age groups differed according to long-term urinary continence: 90% vs. 84% vs. 69% for, respectively, age group one vs. two vs. three (p = 0.018). In the multivariable logistic regression, age group one (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.73, 95% CI 1.44-18.65, p = 0.015) and 2 (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.23-7.29; p = 0.017) were independent predictors for urinary continence, compared to age group three. Conclusion: Younger age, especially & LE;60 years, was associated with better urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. This observation is important at the point of patient education and should be discussed in informed consent.

Source

Publisher

MDPI

Subject

Medicine, General, Internal

Citation

Has Part

Source

Medicina-Lithuania

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.3390/medicina59061153

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

3

Views

6

Downloads

View PlumX Details