Publication:
Impact of age on long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

dc.contributor.coauthorCano Garcia, Cristina
dc.contributor.coauthorWenzel, Mike
dc.contributor.coauthorHumke, Clara
dc.contributor.coauthorWittler, Clarissa
dc.contributor.coauthorDislich, Julius
dc.contributor.coauthorIncesu, Reha-Baris
dc.contributor.coauthorKoellermann, Jens
dc.contributor.coauthorSteuber, Thomas
dc.contributor.coauthorGraefen, Markus
dc.contributor.coauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.coauthorKarakiewicz, Pierre I.
dc.contributor.coauthorKluth, Luis A.
dc.contributor.coauthorPreisser, Felix
dc.contributor.coauthorChun, Felix K. H.
dc.contributor.coauthorMandel, Philipp
dc.contributor.coauthorHoeh, Benedikt
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoç University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-29T09:40:54Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractAim and Objectives: We aimed to test the impact of age on long-term urinary continence (& GE;12 months) in patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods and Materials: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify the patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2014 and January 2021. Patients were divided into three age groups: age group one (& LE;60 years), age group two (61-69 years) and age group three (& GE;70 years). Multivariable logistic regression models tested the differences between the age groups in the analyses addressing long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results: Of the 201 prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, 49 (24%) were assigned to age group one (& LE;60 years), 93 (46%) to age group two (61-69 years) and 59 (29%) to age group three (& GE;70 years). The three age groups differed according to long-term urinary continence: 90% vs. 84% vs. 69% for, respectively, age group one vs. two vs. three (p = 0.018). In the multivariable logistic regression, age group one (Odds Ratio (OR) 4.73, 95% CI 1.44-18.65, p = 0.015) and 2 (OR 2.94; 95% CI 1.23-7.29; p = 0.017) were independent predictors for urinary continence, compared to age group three. Conclusion: Younger age, especially & LE;60 years, was associated with better urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. This observation is important at the point of patient education and should be discussed in informed consent.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.openaccessgold, Green Published
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume59
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/medicina59061153
dc.identifier.eissn1648-9144
dc.identifier.issn1010-660X
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163778372
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061153
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/23483
dc.identifier.wos1017188600001
dc.keywordsUrinary continence
dc.keywordsUrinary incontinence
dc.keywordsAge
dc.keywordsRobotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
dc.languageen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.sourceMedicina-Lithuania
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectGeneral
dc.subjectInternal
dc.titleImpact of age on long-term urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
dc.typeJournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya

Files