Publication:
Fixation methods in latarjet: biomechanical comparison of screw types and plate fixatıon

dc.contributor.coauthorArzu, Ufuk
dc.contributor.coauthorErsin, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorChodza, Mehmet
dc.contributor.coauthorSahin, Koray
dc.contributor.coauthorErsen, Ali
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorKılıçoğlu, Önder
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:32:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjective: Latarjet procedure is often preferred in recurrent shoulder dislocations accompanied by glenoid bone loss. It is observed that the superiority of bone graft fixation methods is still controversial. The aim of this study is to biomechanically compare the bone graft fixation methods in the Latarjet procedure. Methods: 15 third- generation scapula bone models were divided into 3 groups. Graft was fixated in the first group with fully-threaded cortical screws of 3.5mm diameter, in the second group two 16 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws of 4.5mm diameter, and in the third group via a mini plate and screw. The hemispherical humeral head was placed on the tip of the cyclic charge device, and thus, the charge applied to the coracoid graft was homogeneous. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between paired comparisons (p>0.05). The forces in 5 mm displacement in total vary between 502-857N. Total stiffness measurements ranged between 105 and 625; the mean value was 258.13 +/- 53.54 with no statistically significant difference by groups (p = 0.958). Conclusion: This biomechanical study showed that there is no difference between three coracoid fixation options in terms of fixation strength. Unlike previous assumptions, plate fixation is not biomechanically superior to screw fixation. Surgeons should consider their personal preferences and experience in choosing fixation methods.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.openaccessgold, Green Published
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume31
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966
dc.identifier.eissn1809-4406
dc.identifier.issn1413-7852
dc.identifier.quartileQ4
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162132412
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233102e260966
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26422
dc.identifier.wos1069877900004
dc.keywordsShoulder joint
dc.keywordsSurgical procedures
dc.keywordsoperative
dc.keywordsBio-mechanical phenomena
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAtha Comunicacao and Editora
dc.relation.ispartofActa Ortopedica Brasileira
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleFixation methods in latarjet: biomechanical comparison of screw types and plate fixatıon
dc.title.alternativeMétodos de fixação em latarjet: comparação de tipos de parafusos e fixação de placas
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKılıçoğlu, Önder
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR05262.pdf
Size:
664.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format