Publication:
Surface electrogram-guided left ventricular lead placement improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

dc.contributor.coauthorŞipal, Abdulcebbar
dc.contributor.coauthorBozyel, Serdar
dc.contributor.coauthorAktaş, Müjdat
dc.contributor.coauthorDerviş, Emir
dc.contributor.coauthorAkbulut, Tayyar
dc.contributor.coauthorArgan, Onur
dc.contributor.coauthorÇelikyurt, Umut
dc.contributor.coauthorŞahin, Tayfun
dc.contributor.coauthorAğır, Ayşen
dc.contributor.coauthorVural, Ahmet
dc.contributor.kuauthorUral, Dilek
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid1057
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:09:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractObjective: Failure to select the optimal left ventricular (LV) segment for lead implantation is one of the most important causes of unresponsive-ness to the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In our study, we aimed to investigate the echocardiographic and clinical benefits of LV lead implantation guided by an intraoperative 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with multiple target veins. Methods: We included 80 [42 (62.5%) male] heart failure patients who successfully underwent CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. Patients were divided into two groups. In group 1, LV lead was positioned at the site with the shortest biventricular-paced (BiV-paced) QRS duration (QRSd), as intraprocedurally measured using surface ECG. In group 2 (control), we included patients who underwent the standard unguided CRT. ECG, echocardiogram, and functional status were evaluated before and 6 months after CRT implantation in all patients. Results: In group 1, BiV-paced QRSd measurements were successfully performed in 112 of 120 coronary sinus branches during CRT and an LV lead was successfully placed at the optimal site in all patients. Compared with group 2, group 1 had a significantly higher rate (85% vs. 50%, p=0.02) of response (>15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume) to CRT as well as a shorter QRSd (p<0.001) and a greater QRS shortening (∆QRS) associated with CRT compared with baseline (p<0.001). The mean New York Heart Association functional class was significantly improved in both groups, and no significant differences were found in clinical response to CRT (85% vs. 70%, p=0.181). Conclusion: Surface ECG can be used to guide LV lead placement in patients with multiple target veins for improving response to CRT. Thus, it is a safe, feasible, and economic approach for CRT-D implantation.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume19
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.09216
dc.identifier.issn2149-2263
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85043578977&doi=10.14744%2fAnatolJCardiol.2018.09216&partnerID=40&md5=0f0d68697b1ec56a10eb4ee4cec9b044
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85043578977
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.09216
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9307
dc.keywordsCardiac resynchronization therapy
dc.keywordsElectrocardiogram
dc.keywordsLeft ventricular lead placement
dc.keywordsQRS duration
dc.keywordsResponse to CRT
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherTurkish Society of Cardiology
dc.sourceAnatolian Journal of Cardiology
dc.subjectHeart
dc.subjectArrhythmia
dc.subjectCardiovascular systems
dc.titleSurface electrogram-guided left ventricular lead placement improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-6419-0323
local.contributor.kuauthorUral, Dilek

Files