Publication: Surface electrogram-guided left ventricular lead placement improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Şipal, Abdulcebbar
Bozyel, Serdar
Aktaş, Müjdat
Derviş, Emir
Akbulut, Tayyar
Argan, Onur
Çelikyurt, Umut
Şahin, Tayfun
Ağır, Ayşen
Vural, Ahmet
Advisor
Publication Date
Language
English
Type
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Abstract
Objective: Failure to select the optimal left ventricular (LV) segment for lead implantation is one of the most important causes of unresponsive-ness to the cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In our study, we aimed to investigate the echocardiographic and clinical benefits of LV lead implantation guided by an intraoperative 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) in patients with multiple target veins. Methods: We included 80 [42 (62.5%) male] heart failure patients who successfully underwent CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. Patients were divided into two groups. In group 1, LV lead was positioned at the site with the shortest biventricular-paced (BiV-paced) QRS duration (QRSd), as intraprocedurally measured using surface ECG. In group 2 (control), we included patients who underwent the standard unguided CRT. ECG, echocardiogram, and functional status were evaluated before and 6 months after CRT implantation in all patients. Results: In group 1, BiV-paced QRSd measurements were successfully performed in 112 of 120 coronary sinus branches during CRT and an LV lead was successfully placed at the optimal site in all patients. Compared with group 2, group 1 had a significantly higher rate (85% vs. 50%, p=0.02) of response (>15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume) to CRT as well as a shorter QRSd (p<0.001) and a greater QRS shortening (∆QRS) associated with CRT compared with baseline (p<0.001). The mean New York Heart Association functional class was significantly improved in both groups, and no significant differences were found in clinical response to CRT (85% vs. 70%, p=0.181). Conclusion: Surface ECG can be used to guide LV lead placement in patients with multiple target veins for improving response to CRT. Thus, it is a safe, feasible, and economic approach for CRT-D implantation.
Description
Source:
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Publisher:
Turkish Society of Cardiology
Keywords:
Subject
Heart, Arrhythmia, Cardiovascular systems