Publication: Theory building through replication response to commentaries on the "many labs"replication project
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Klein, Richard A.
Ratliff, Kate A.
Vianello, Michelangelo
Adams, Reginald B., Jr.
Bahnik, Stepan
Bernstein, Michael J.
Bocian, Konrad
Brandt, Mark J.
Brooks, Beach
Brumbaugh, Claudia Chloe
Publication Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
While direct replications such as the “Many Labs” project are extremely valuable in testing the reliability of published findings across laboratories, they reflect the common reliance in psychology on single vignettes or stimuli, which limits the scope of the conclusions that can be reached. New experimental tools and statistical techniques make it easier to routinely sample stimuli, and to appropriately treat them as random factors. We encourage researchers to get into the habit of including multiple versions of the content (e.g., stimuli or vignettes) in their designs, to increase confidence in cross-stimulus generalization and to yield more realistic estimates of effect size. We call on editors to be aware of the challenges inherent in such stimulus sampling, to expect and tolerate unexplained variability in observed effect size between stimuli, and to encourage stimulus sampling instead of the deceptively cleaner picture offered by the current reliance on single stimuli.
Source
Publisher
Hogrefe Publishing
Subject
Psychology, Social
Citation
Has Part
Source
Social Psychology
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1027/1864-9335/a000202