<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Determination of Turkish norms of psychometric tests for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy and proposal of a high sensitive screening test battery

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Ozbas, Burak

Keskin, Onur

Hecker, Hartmut

Karahan, Irfan

Ozbas, Cansu

Kalkan, Cagdas

Kartal, Aysun

Onder, Fatih Oguz

Oncu, Burcu Kahveci

Gunsar, Fulya

Date

Language

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) needs local standardization. Aims This study aimed at standardizing PHES for Turkish patients and compare them with German norms; to determine minimal hepatic encephalopathy (mHE) prevalence with two different methods [PHES battery and Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF)] and to assess whether sub-tests of the battery can be used for screening for mHE. Methods Healthy volunteers (n = 816; 400 male) and cirrhotics (n = 124; 58 male) were included. For mHE diagnosis PHES score threshold was set at <= - 5 points and that of CFF at < 39 Hz. For comparing German and Turkish norms, datasets were combined. Multiple backward procedure was applied to assess effects of age, sex and education on single tests of the battery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for assessing diagnostic capabilities of subtests of the battery. Results PHES norms for Turks were developed. MHE prevalence in compensated cirrhotics was 29.8% and 27.4% with PHES and CFF tests, respectively, with low compatibility (kappa coefficient 0.389); mHE prevalence decreased to 16% when both tests were combined. Turks performed worse vs Germans in the digit symbol (DS) and serial dotting (SD) subtests but performed better in other subtests. In ROC analyzes of subtests, the combination of DS + SD tests achieved an AUROC of 0.974 versus PHES. Conclusions Use of two methods for diagnosing mHE is important for research purposes. From a clinical perspective, sensitivity with acceptable specificity may suffice for screening instruments for mHE. Combined use of DS and SD subtests of the PHES battery appears suitable for this purpose.

Source

Publisher

Springer

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Hepatology International

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1007/s12072-021-10207-5

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

N/A

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
0
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators