<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Why the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Program

KU-Authors

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Weyl famously argued that if space were discrete, then Euclidean geometry could not hold even approximately. Since then, many philosophers have responded to this argument by advancing alternative accounts of discrete geometry that recover approximately Euclidean space. However, they have missed an importantly flawed assumption in Weyl’s argument: physical geometry is determined by fundamental spacetime structures independently from dynamical laws. In this article, I aim to show its falsity through two rigorous examples: random walks in statistical physics and quantum mechanics.

Source

Publisher

University of Chicago Press

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1086/722106

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

Copyrighted

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

Copyrighted

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
0
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators