Publication:
Why the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong

dc.contributor.coauthorChen, Lu (57236657500)
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-31T08:25:41Z
dc.date.available2025-12-31
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractWeyl famously argued that if space were discrete, then Euclidean geometry could not hold even approximately. Since then, many philosophers have responded to this argument by advancing alternative accounts of discrete geometry that recover approximately Euclidean space. However, they have missed an importantly flawed assumption in Weyl’s argument: physical geometry is determined by fundamental spacetime structures independently from dynamical laws. In this article, I aim to show its falsity through two rigorous examples: random walks in statistical physics and quantum mechanics. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.openaccessAll Open Access; Green Accepted Open Access; Green Open Access
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/722106
dc.identifier.eissn0007-0882
dc.identifier.embargoNo
dc.identifier.issn1464-3537
dc.identifier.quartileN/A
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105019509784
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1086/722106
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31880
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Press
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal for the Philosophy of Science
dc.relation.openaccessNo
dc.rightsCopyrighted
dc.titleWhy the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files