Publication: Why the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Philosophy | |
| dc.contributor.kuauthor | Chen, Lu | |
| dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | College of Social Sciences and Humanities | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-31T08:25:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Weyl famously argued that if space were discrete, then Euclidean geometry could not hold even approximately. Since then, many philosophers have responded to this argument by advancing alternative accounts of discrete geometry that recover approximately Euclidean space. However, they have missed an importantly flawed assumption in Weyl’s argument: physical geometry is determined by fundamental spacetime structures independently from dynamical laws. In this article, I aim to show its falsity through two rigorous examples: random walks in statistical physics and quantum mechanics. | |
| dc.description.fulltext | No | |
| dc.description.harvestedfrom | Manual | |
| dc.description.indexedby | WOS | |
| dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
| dc.description.openaccess | All Open Access; Green Accepted Open Access; Green Open Access | |
| dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
| dc.description.readpublish | N/A | |
| dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | N/A | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/722106 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 0007-0882 | |
| dc.identifier.embargo | No | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 845 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1464-3537 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 4 | |
| dc.identifier.quartile | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105019509784 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 823 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1086/722106 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/31880 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 76 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 001633564200009 | |
| dc.keywords | Weyl's Argument | |
| dc.keywords | Euclidean space | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | University of Chicago Press | |
| dc.relation.affiliation | Koç University | |
| dc.relation.collection | Koç University Institutional Repository | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | |
| dc.relation.openaccess | No | |
| dc.rights | Copyrighted | |
| dc.subject | History & Philosophy Of Science | |
| dc.subject | Philosophy | |
| dc.title | Why the Weyl Tile Argument Is Wrong | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| person.familyName | Chen | |
| person.givenName | Lu | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 005b6224-491a-49b4-9afc-a4413d87712b | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 005b6224-491a-49b4-9afc-a4413d87712b | |
| relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication | 3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794 | |
| relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 3f7621e3-0d26-42c2-af64-58a329522794 |
