<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Bevacizumab combined with irinotecan or temozolomide in recurrent glioblastoma: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,

Program

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Alan, Ozkan

Yildiz, Oguzhan

Karakurt, Melek

Yildirim, Eda Caliskan

Colak, Rumeysa

Yilmaz, Mesut

Celebi, Abdussamet

Er, Ozlem

Celayir, Ozde Melisa

Akdag, Mutianur Ozkorkmaz

Date

Language

Embargo Status

No

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Purpose Given the lack of an effective systemic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma, this study aims to compare response rates, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity profiles of bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) versus irinotecan. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with recurrent glioblastoma from seventeen oncology centers in T & uuml;rkiye who received bevacizumab combined with either TMZ or irinotecan after progression. Outcomes included response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events assessed by CTCAE v4.0. Results Among 210 patients with recurrent glioblastoma, the median PFS was 7.9 months overall (5.2 months with TMZ-bevacizumab and 8.2 months with irinotecan-bevacizumab), and the median OS was 10.6 months overall (11.3 and 10.3 months, respectively). Six-month PFS and OS rates were 60% and 68% for the entire cohort, with no statistically significant differences between treatment regimens. Both combinations were generally well tolerated, with hypertension more frequent in the TMZ arm and liver enzyme elevation more common in the irinotecan arm. Conclusion In this multicenter cohort of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, bevacizumab combined with either temozolomide or irinotecan demonstrated comparable PFS and OS outcomes. Both regimens were generally well tolerated, suggesting that treatment choice may be guided by individual patient profiles and toxicity considerations rather than differences in efficacy.

Source

Publisher

Springer

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Journal of Neuro-Oncology

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1007/s11060-025-05415-0

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

Copyrighted

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

Copyrighted

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
9
Görüntülenme
0
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators