Publication:
Anesthesiological and surgical perspectives on using 8 MMHG versus 12 MMHG pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic radical prostatectomy: Results of a prospective randomized study

Thumbnail Image

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Robotik radikal prostatektomide 8 MMHG ve 12 MMHG pnömoperiton basınçlarının karşılaştırılması: anesteziolojik ve cerrahi perspektiften prospektif randomize kontrollü çalışma

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effects of 8 mmHg and 12 mmHg pneumoperitoneum (PNP) pressures on operative, postoperative, and anesthesiological parameters in robot -assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: In this prospective study, 43 patients undergoing RARP performed by a single experienced surgeon were randomly assigned to either the low-pressure group (8 mmHg - Group I) or the standard -pressure group (12 mmHg - Group II). We evaluated the operative and postoperative parameters from both urological and anesthesiological perspectives. All patients were treated using the AirSeal (R) insufflation system. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of console time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, or hospital length of stay. PNP was increased due to bleeding in six patients in the 8 mmHg group and two patients in the 12 mmHg group. Except for the heart rate measured five minutes after the initial incision, there were no observed differences between the groups in terms of blood pressure, ventilation, and administered medications. The heart rate was significantly lower in Group I (54.4 vs. 68.8, p=0.006). Additionally, during the surgery, the number of manipulations performed by the anesthesiologists, including drug administrations and ventilator management, was significantly lower in Group I (6.1 vs. 9.6, p=0.041). CONCLUSION: In RARP, while the 8 mmHg PNP pressure does not demonstrate differences in operative parameters compared to the 12 mmHg pressure, it offers the advantage of requiring fewer anesthetic interventions, thus minimizing the impact on cardiovascular and respiratory systems.

Source

Publisher

Turkish Assoc Trauma Emergency Surgery

Subject

Emergency, Medicine

Citation

Has Part

Source

Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi = Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery : TJTES

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.14744/tjtes.2024.78617

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

4

Views

3

Downloads

View PlumX Details