Publication:
Comparing performance between clinics of an embryo evaluation algorithm based on time-lapse images and machine learning

Thumbnail Image

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Johansen, Martin N.
Parner, Erik T.
Kragh, Mikkel F.
Kato, Keiichi
Ueno, Satoshi
Palm, Stefan
Kernbach, Manuel
Balaban, Basak
Gabrielsen, Anette V.
Iversen, Lea H.

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

PurposeThis article aims to assess how differences in maternal age distributions between IVF clinics affect the performance of an artificial intelligence model for embryo viability prediction and proposes a method to account for such differences.MethodsUsing retrospectively collected data from 4805 fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfers of embryos incubated for 5 to 6 days, the discriminative performance was assessed based on fetal heartbeat outcomes. The data was collected from 4 clinics, and the discrimination was measured in terms of the area under ROC curves (AUC) for each clinic. To account for the different age distributions between clinics, a method for age-standardizing the AUCs was developed in which the clinic-specific AUCs were standardized using weights for each embryo according to the relative frequency of the maternal age in the relevant clinic compared to the age distribution in a common reference population.ResultsThere was substantial variation in the clinic-specific AUCs with estimates ranging from 0.58 to 0.69 before standardization. The age-standardization of the AUCs reduced the between-clinic variance by 16%. Most notably, three of the clinics had quite similar AUCs after standardization, while the last clinic had a markedly lower AUC both with and without standardization.ConclusionThe method of using age-standardization of the AUCs that is proposed in this article mitigates some of the variability between clinics. This enables a comparison of clinic-specific AUCs where the difference in age distributions is accounted for.

Source

Publisher

Springer/Plenum Publishers

Subject

Genetics, Gynecology, Reproductive Biology

Citation

Has Part

Source

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1007/s10815-023-02871-3

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

3

Views

4

Downloads

View PlumX Details