Publication:
Comparing performance between clinics of an embryo evaluation algorithm based on time-lapse images and machine learning

dc.contributor.coauthorJohansen, Martin N.
dc.contributor.coauthorParner, Erik T.
dc.contributor.coauthorKragh, Mikkel F.
dc.contributor.coauthorKato, Keiichi
dc.contributor.coauthorUeno, Satoshi
dc.contributor.coauthorPalm, Stefan
dc.contributor.coauthorKernbach, Manuel
dc.contributor.coauthorBalaban, Basak
dc.contributor.coauthorGabrielsen, Anette V.
dc.contributor.coauthorIversen, Lea H.
dc.contributor.coauthorBerntsen, Jorgen
dc.contributor.departmentKUH (Koç University Hospital)
dc.contributor.kuauthorKeleş, İpek
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteKUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-19T10:32:24Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPurposeThis article aims to assess how differences in maternal age distributions between IVF clinics affect the performance of an artificial intelligence model for embryo viability prediction and proposes a method to account for such differences.MethodsUsing retrospectively collected data from 4805 fresh and frozen single blastocyst transfers of embryos incubated for 5 to 6 days, the discriminative performance was assessed based on fetal heartbeat outcomes. The data was collected from 4 clinics, and the discrimination was measured in terms of the area under ROC curves (AUC) for each clinic. To account for the different age distributions between clinics, a method for age-standardizing the AUCs was developed in which the clinic-specific AUCs were standardized using weights for each embryo according to the relative frequency of the maternal age in the relevant clinic compared to the age distribution in a common reference population.ResultsThere was substantial variation in the clinic-specific AUCs with estimates ranging from 0.58 to 0.69 before standardization. The age-standardization of the AUCs reduced the between-clinic variance by 16%. Most notably, three of the clinics had quite similar AUCs after standardization, while the last clinic had a markedly lower AUC both with and without standardization.ConclusionThe method of using age-standardization of the AUCs that is proposed in this article mitigates some of the variability between clinics. This enables a comparison of clinic-specific AUCs where the difference in age distributions is accounted for.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue9
dc.description.openaccesshybrid, Green Published
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume40
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10815-023-02871-3
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7330
dc.identifier.issn1058-0468
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85164161521
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02871-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/26402
dc.identifier.wos1024562100001
dc.keywordsEmbryo selection
dc.keywordsTime-lapse
dc.keywordsArtificial intelligence
dc.keywordsModel performance
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer/Plenum Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
dc.subjectGenetics
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.subjectReproductive Biology
dc.titleComparing performance between clinics of an embryo evaluation algorithm based on time-lapse images and machine learning
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKeleş, İpek
local.publication.orgunit1KUH (KOÇ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL)
local.publication.orgunit2KUH (Koç University Hospital)
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf91d21f0-6b13-46ce-939a-db68e4c8d2ab
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery055775c9-9efe-43ec-814f-f6d771fa6dee

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
IR05157.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format