Publication:
Mice are near optimal timers

dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorBalcı, Fuat
dc.contributor.kuauthorGür, Ezgi
dc.contributor.kuauthorErdaǧı, Alihan
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.kuprofilePhD Student
dc.contributor.otherDepartment of Psychology
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteGraduate School of Health Sciences
dc.contributor.yokid51269
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.contributor.yokidN/A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:04:24Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMany conventional interval timing tasks do not contain asymmetric cost (loss) functions and thereby favor high temporal accuracy. On the other hand, asymmetric cost functions that differentially penalize/reinforce the early or late responses result in adaptive biases (shift) in timed responses due to timing uncertainty. Consequently, optimal performance in these tasks entails the normative parametrization of adaptive timing biases by the level of timing uncertainty. Differential reinforcement of response duration (DRRD) is one of these tasks that require mice to actively respond (e.g., continuously depressing a lever) for a minimum amount of time to be reinforced. The active production of a time interval by mice in DRRD differentiates this task from the differential reinforcement of low rates of responding (DRL) task as a passive waiting task that was used in earlier studies to investigate the optimality of adaptive biases in timing behavior. We tested 21 Th-Cre male mice (9 weeks old) in a DRRD task with a minimum requirement of 2 s. Mean response durations were positively biased (longer than the minimum requirement), and the extent of bias was predicted by the level of endogenous timing uncertainty. Mice nearly maximized the reward rate in this task. These results contribute to the accumulating evidence supporting optimal temporal risk assessment in non-human animals.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume23
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/22134468-bja10053
dc.identifier.issn2213-445X
dc.identifier.linkhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85134422137&doi=10.1163%2f22134468-bja10053&partnerID=40&md5=9a0b50c666fce59b6fc26713797bb499
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134422137
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10053
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/8635
dc.identifier.wos982784800002
dc.keywordsDifferential reinforcement of response duration
dc.keywordsInterval timing
dc.keywordsMice
dc.keywordsOptimality
dc.keywordsReward maximization
dc.keywordsTiming uncertainty
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherBrill
dc.sourceTiming and Time Perception
dc.subjectNeurosciences
dc.subjectNeurology
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleMice are near optimal timers
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-3390-9352
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-3103-2446
local.contributor.authorid0000-0003-1430-6564
local.contributor.kuauthorBalcı, Fuat
local.contributor.kuauthorGür, Ezgi
local.contributor.kuauthorErdaǧı, Alihan
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd5fc0361-3a0a-4b96-bf2e-5cd6b2b0b08c

Files