Publication: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Kale, Santosh
Patil, Prithvi
Kannadath, Bijun
Ramireddy, Srinivas
Badillo, Ricardo
DaVee, Roy Tomas
Thosani, Nirav
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided liver biopsy is a novel technique to obtain adequate liver samples for diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. There are studies that have evaluated the feasibility and safety of EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy (EUS-LB), however, factors that can influence specimen quality are yet to be determined. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-LB and evaluate factors associated with specimen quality. Methods We performed a detailed search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science (TM) databases to identify studies in which results of EUS-guided liver parenchymal biopsies were reported published up to July 2020. A random effects model was used to estimate pooled values (mean +/- SE) for total specimen length (TSL) and complete portal tracts (CPT). Subgroup analyses were applied to find out the procedural factors associated with better specimen quality using Cochran'sQtest. A total of 10 meta-analyses were done focusing on international studies. Total of 1326 patients who underwent EUS-LB. EUS-LBs performed for suspicion of parenchymal liver disease. Pooled mean values for TSL and CPT with subgroup analyses. Results Twenty-three studies with a total of 1326 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Overall pooled mean TSL and CPT were 45.3 +/- 4.6 mm and 15.8 +/- 1.5, respectively. In subgroup analysis, core biopsy needles proved to better in terms of CPT than fine-needle aspiration needles (18.4 vs 10.99,p = 0.003). FNB with slow-pull or suction technique provided a similar TSL (44.3 vs 53.9 mm,p = 0.40), however, slow-pull technique was better in terms of CPT (30 vs 14.6,p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was present among the studies. Another limitation is the low number randomized control trials. Conclusion EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy is a good alternative to other methods of liver sampling. Using FNB needles with a slow-pull technique can provide better results.
Source
Publisher
Springer
Subject
Surgery
Citation
Has Part
Source
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1007/s00464-020-08053-x
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
