<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Departments

Item type:Organizational Unit,

School / College / Institute

Item type:Organizational Unit,
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU-Authors

Organization Authors

Co-Authors

Kale, Santosh

Patil, Prithvi

Kannadath, Bijun

Ramireddy, Srinivas

Badillo, Ricardo

DaVee, Roy Tomas

Thosani, Nirav

Date

Language

Type

Embargo Status

N/A

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided liver biopsy is a novel technique to obtain adequate liver samples for diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. There are studies that have evaluated the feasibility and safety of EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy (EUS-LB), however, factors that can influence specimen quality are yet to be determined. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-LB and evaluate factors associated with specimen quality. Methods We performed a detailed search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science (TM) databases to identify studies in which results of EUS-guided liver parenchymal biopsies were reported published up to July 2020. A random effects model was used to estimate pooled values (mean +/- SE) for total specimen length (TSL) and complete portal tracts (CPT). Subgroup analyses were applied to find out the procedural factors associated with better specimen quality using Cochran'sQtest. A total of 10 meta-analyses were done focusing on international studies. Total of 1326 patients who underwent EUS-LB. EUS-LBs performed for suspicion of parenchymal liver disease. Pooled mean values for TSL and CPT with subgroup analyses. Results Twenty-three studies with a total of 1326 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Overall pooled mean TSL and CPT were 45.3 +/- 4.6 mm and 15.8 +/- 1.5, respectively. In subgroup analysis, core biopsy needles proved to better in terms of CPT than fine-needle aspiration needles (18.4 vs 10.99,p = 0.003). FNB with slow-pull or suction technique provided a similar TSL (44.3 vs 53.9 mm,p = 0.40), however, slow-pull technique was better in terms of CPT (30 vs 14.6,p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was present among the studies. Another limitation is the low number randomized control trials. Conclusion EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy is a good alternative to other methods of liver sampling. Using FNB needles with a slow-pull technique can provide better results.

Source

Publisher

Springer

Subject

Citation

item.page.haspartof

Source

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

item.page.ispartofseries

item.page.edition

DOI

10.1007/s00464-020-08053-x

item.page.datauri

item.page.link

Rights

N/A

Copyrights Note

Rights and licensing

N/A

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Patent

Related Goal

Item type:Goal, Access status: Open Access ,
03 - Good Health and Well-being
Over the last 15 years, the number of childhood deaths has been cut in half. This proves that it is possible to win the fight against almost every disease. Still, we are spending an astonishing amount of money and resources on treating illnesses that are surprisingly easy to prevent. The new goal for worldwide Good Health promotes healthy lifestyles, preventive measures and modern, efficient healthcare for everyone.
Google Scholar
Scholar'da Ara ↗
0
Görüntülenme
0
İndirme
Altmetric
Dimensions
PlumX Metrikleri
BIP! Indicators