Publication:
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.coauthorKale, Santosh
dc.contributor.coauthorPatil, Prithvi
dc.contributor.coauthorKannadath, Bijun
dc.contributor.coauthorRamireddy, Srinivas
dc.contributor.coauthorBadillo, Ricardo
dc.contributor.coauthorDaVee, Roy Tomas
dc.contributor.coauthorThosani, Nirav
dc.contributor.departmentN/A
dc.contributor.kuauthorBaran, Bülent
dc.contributor.kuprofileFaculty Member
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.yokid167583
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided liver biopsy is a novel technique to obtain adequate liver samples for diagnosis of liver parenchymal diseases. There are studies that have evaluated the feasibility and safety of EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy (EUS-LB), however, factors that can influence specimen quality are yet to be determined. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-LB and evaluate factors associated with specimen quality. Methods We performed a detailed search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science (TM) databases to identify studies in which results of EUS-guided liver parenchymal biopsies were reported published up to July 2020. A random effects model was used to estimate pooled values (mean +/- SE) for total specimen length (TSL) and complete portal tracts (CPT). Subgroup analyses were applied to find out the procedural factors associated with better specimen quality using Cochran'sQtest. A total of 10 meta-analyses were done focusing on international studies. Total of 1326 patients who underwent EUS-LB. EUS-LBs performed for suspicion of parenchymal liver disease. Pooled mean values for TSL and CPT with subgroup analyses. Results Twenty-three studies with a total of 1326 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Overall pooled mean TSL and CPT were 45.3 +/- 4.6 mm and 15.8 +/- 1.5, respectively. In subgroup analysis, core biopsy needles proved to better in terms of CPT than fine-needle aspiration needles (18.4 vs 10.99,p = 0.003). FNB with slow-pull or suction technique provided a similar TSL (44.3 vs 53.9 mm,p = 0.40), however, slow-pull technique was better in terms of CPT (30 vs 14.6,p < 0.001). Heterogeneity was present among the studies. Another limitation is the low number randomized control trials. Conclusion EUS-guided parenchymal liver biopsy is a good alternative to other methods of liver sampling. Using FNB needles with a slow-pull technique can provide better results.
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.volume35
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-020-08053-x
dc.identifier.eissn1432-2218
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85092495030
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08053-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/14385
dc.identifier.wos577254500001
dc.keywordsEndoscopic ultrasonography
dc.keywordsFine-needle biopsy
dc.keywordsLiver biopsy
dc.keywordsLiver parenchymal disease
dc.keywordsLiver histology fine-needle-aspiration
dc.keywordsSingle-center experience
dc.keywordsDiagnostic yield
dc.keywordsSpecimen size
dc.keywordsEus
dc.keywordsAdequacy
dc.keywordsFna
dc.keywords19-Gauge
dc.keywordsDisease
dc.keywordsQuality
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.sourceSurgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleEndoscopic ultrasound-guided parenchymal liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeReview
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.authorid0000-0001-7966-2346
local.contributor.kuauthorBaran, Bülent

Files