Publication: Fundus topographical distribution patterns of ocular toxoplasmosis
Program
KU-Authors
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Halim, Muhammad Sohail
Ozdal, Pinar Cakar
Ormaechea, Maria Soledad
Ozdemir, Huseyin Baran
Uludag, Gunay
Sredar, Nripun
Cankurtaran, Mahmut
Liu, Xiaoxuan
Denniston, Alastair Keith
Rudzinski, Marcelo N.
Publication Date
Language
Type
Embargo Status
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
BackgroundTo establish topographic maps and determine fundus distribution patterns of ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) lesions. MethodsIn this retrospective study, patients who presented with OT to ophthalmology clinics from four countries (Argentina, Turkey, UK, USA) were included. Size, shape and location of primary (1 degrees)/recurrent (2 degrees) and active/inactive lesions were converted into a two-dimensional retinal chart by a retinal drawing software. A final contour map of the merged image charts was then created using a custom Matlab programme. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results984 lesions in 514 eyes of 464 subjects (53% women) were included. Mean area of all 1 degrees and 2 degrees lesions was 5.96 +/- 12.26 and 5.21 +/- 12.77 mm(2), respectively. For the subset group lesions (eyes with both 1 degrees and 2 degrees lesions), 1 degrees lesions were significantly larger than 2 degrees lesions (5.52 +/- 6.04 mm(2) vs 4.09 +/- 8.90 mm(2), p=0.038). Mean distances from foveola to 1 degrees and 2 degrees lesion centres were 6336 +/- 4267 and 5763 +/- 3491 mu m, respectively. The majority of lesions were found in temporal quadrant (p<0.001). Maximum overlap of all lesions was at 278 mu m inferotemporal to foveola. ConclusionThe 1 degrees lesions were larger than 2 degrees lesions. The 2 degrees lesions were not significantly closer to fovea than 1 degrees lesions. Temporal quadrant and macular region were found to be densely affected underlining the vision threatening nature of the disease.
Source
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Subject
Ophthalmology, Medicine
Citation
Has Part
Source
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.1136/bjo-2022-322747