Publication:
Split liver transplant from deceased marginal donor: a case report

Placeholder

Departments

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

N/A

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

The relative paucity of deceased donor organs and the progressive increase in patients with cirrhosis have led transplant centers to consider organs from marginal donors (elderly donors, prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), liver steatosis-steatotic grafts, severe hypernatremia, and use of inotropes). Recently, the use of those marginal grafts has increased, but splitting liver is still debatable.Herein, we present a 28-year-old deceased donor who had a history of traumatic brain injury. The patient stayed in ICU for 3 days with high sodium level (188 mEq/L) and was hemodynamically supported with single inotrope. At the time of procurement, core biopsies were taken from the right lobe and left lateral segment of the liver, with results demonstrating 5% necrosis. A decision was made for split liver transplant as left lateral sector and extended right lobe.Liver graft was divided into a left lateral segment to be transplanted to a 4-year-old child with secondary biliary cirrhosis due to previous liver transplant and a right extended liver lobe for an adult patient with hepatocellular carcinoma waiting 10 months on the waiting list. Both liver transplants were performed uneventfully. Patients were discharged on the 11th and 56th days after transplant. The liver function tests remained normal during the follow up period of 2 years. A marginal graft with more than one risk factor should not be discarded liberally. Splitting such grafts could be considered in a highly selective recipients.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier Science Inc

Subject

Immunology, Surgery, Transplantation

Citation

Has Part

Source

Transplantation Proceedings

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.01.014

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details