Publication:
An evaluation of remission rates with first and second line treatments and indicators of antihistamine refractoriness in chronic urticaria

Placeholder

Departments

Organizational Unit

School / College / Institute

Organizational Unit
SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
Upper Org Unit

Program

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Ornek, Sinem Ayse
Orcen, Cihan
Church, Martin K.

Publication Date

Language

Embargo Status

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Alternative Title

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend standard doses of antihistamines as first-line, and updosing of antihistamines as second-line treatment for the management of chronic urticaria (CU). However, remission rates with different types of first- and second-line treatments and indicators of antihistamine response are largely lacking in the literature.Objectives: To examine response rates to first- and second-line treatments in CU, and to identify patient characteristics that can predict antihistamine treatment outcomes.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes of 657 CU (556 chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), 101 chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU)) patients who had at least 3-months of follow-up data.Results: A standard dose of second generation antihistamines (sgAH) was effective in 43.1 % of the patients. An additional 28.8 % of patients were in remission with second-line treatments. Among patients whose disease was in remission with a standard dose of sgAHs, 14.8 % benefited from switching from their current sgAH to another sgAH. Updosing sgAHs, combination of two different sgAHs, sgAH and first generation H1-antihistamine combination, and sgAH and leukotriene receptor antagonist combination provided remission in 38.3 %, 35.8 %, 37.5 % and 25 % of patients who were given these treatments, respectively. Baseline UCT score <= 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU were found to be risk factors for antihistamine refractoriness in patients with CSU.Conclusions: A step-wise approach to the management of CU is practical as more patients respond to treatment at each step. The presence of baseline UCT score <= 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU might be helpful to determine patients who require third-line treatments in advance.

Source

Publisher

Elsevier

Subject

Immunology, Pharmacology, Pharmacy

Citation

Has Part

Source

International Immunopharmacology

Book Series Title

Edition

DOI

10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109198

item.page.datauri

Link

Rights

Copyrights Note

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

0

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details