Publication:
An evaluation of remission rates with first and second line treatments and indicators of antihistamine refractoriness in chronic urticaria

dc.contributor.coauthorOrnek, Sinem Ayse
dc.contributor.coauthorOrcen, Cihan
dc.contributor.coauthorChurch, Martin K.
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorKocatürk Göncü, Özgür Emek
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-10T00:11:42Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Guidelines recommend standard doses of antihistamines as first-line, and updosing of antihistamines as second-line treatment for the management of chronic urticaria (CU). However, remission rates with different types of first- and second-line treatments and indicators of antihistamine response are largely lacking in the literature.Objectives: To examine response rates to first- and second-line treatments in CU, and to identify patient characteristics that can predict antihistamine treatment outcomes.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes of 657 CU (556 chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), 101 chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU)) patients who had at least 3-months of follow-up data.Results: A standard dose of second generation antihistamines (sgAH) was effective in 43.1 % of the patients. An additional 28.8 % of patients were in remission with second-line treatments. Among patients whose disease was in remission with a standard dose of sgAHs, 14.8 % benefited from switching from their current sgAH to another sgAH. Updosing sgAHs, combination of two different sgAHs, sgAH and first generation H1-antihistamine combination, and sgAH and leukotriene receptor antagonist combination provided remission in 38.3 %, 35.8 %, 37.5 % and 25 % of patients who were given these treatments, respectively. Baseline UCT score <= 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU were found to be risk factors for antihistamine refractoriness in patients with CSU.Conclusions: A step-wise approach to the management of CU is practical as more patients respond to treatment at each step. The presence of baseline UCT score <= 4, emergency referral and family history of CSU might be helpful to determine patients who require third-line treatments in advance.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.volume112
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109198
dc.identifier.eissn1878-1705
dc.identifier.issn1567-5769
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138036986
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109198
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/17529
dc.identifier.wos863982700001
dc.keywordsUrticaria
dc.keywordsAntihistamines
dc.keywordsUpdosing
dc.keywordsCombination
dc.keywordsBiomarker
dc.keywordsPredictor
dc.keywordsAntihistamine resistance
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Immunopharmacology
dc.subjectImmunology
dc.subjectPharmacology
dc.subjectPharmacy
dc.titleAn evaluation of remission rates with first and second line treatments and indicators of antihistamine refractoriness in chronic urticaria
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorKocatürk Göncü, Özgür Emek
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files