Publication:
Outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy in a large-scale, contemporary cohort of bladder cancer patients

Thumbnail Image

Organizational Units

Program

KU-Authors

KU Authors

Co-Authors

Hoeh, Benedikt
Flammia, Rocco S.
Hohenhorst, Lukas
Sorce, Gabriele
Chierigo, Francesco
Panunzio, Andrea
Tian, Zhe
Saad, Fred
Gallucci, Michele
Briganti, Alberto

Advisor

Publication Date

2022

Language

English

Type

Journal Article

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

Background and objectives: to test for differences in perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs (THC) in nonmetastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing open (ORC) versus robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Methods: we relied on the National Inpatient Sample database (2016-2019). Statistics consisted of trend analyses, multivariable logistic, Poisson, and linear regression models. Results Of 5280 patients, 1876 (36%) versus 3200 (60%) underwent RARC versus ORC. RARC increased from 32% to 41% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: + 8.6%; p = 0.02). Rates of transfusion (8% vs. 16%), intraoperative (2% vs. 3%), wound (6% vs. 10%), and pulmonary (6% vs. 10%) complications were lower in RARC patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, median length of stay (LOS) was shorter in RARC (6 vs. 7days; p < 0.001). Conversely, median THC (31,486 vs. 27,162$; p < 0.001) were higher in RARC. Multivariable logistic regression-derived odds ratios addressing transfusion (0.49), intraoperative (0.53), wound (0.68), and pulmonary (0.71) complications favored RARC (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Poisson and linear regression models, RARC was associated with shorter LOS (Rate ratio:0.86; p < 0.001), yet higher THC (Coef.:5,859$; p < 0.001). RARC in-hospital mortality was lower (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.04). Conclusions: RARC complications, LOS, and mortality appear more favorable than ORC, but result in higher THC. The favorable RARC profile contributes to its increasing popularity throughout the United States.

Description

Source:

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Publisher:

Wiley

Keywords:

Subject

Oncology, Surgery

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Copy Rights Note

1

Views

0

Downloads

View PlumX Details