Publication:
Outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy in a large-scale, contemporary cohort of bladder cancer patients

dc.contributor.coauthorHoeh, Benedikt
dc.contributor.coauthorFlammia, Rocco S.
dc.contributor.coauthorHohenhorst, Lukas
dc.contributor.coauthorSorce, Gabriele
dc.contributor.coauthorChierigo, Francesco
dc.contributor.coauthorPanunzio, Andrea
dc.contributor.coauthorTian, Zhe
dc.contributor.coauthorSaad, Fred
dc.contributor.coauthorGallucci, Michele
dc.contributor.coauthorBriganti, Alberto
dc.contributor.coauthorTerrone, Carlo
dc.contributor.coauthorShariat, Shahrokh F.
dc.contributor.coauthorGraefen, Markus
dc.contributor.coauthorAntonelli, Alessandro
dc.contributor.coauthorKluth, Luis A.
dc.contributor.coauthorBecker, Andreas
dc.contributor.coauthorChun, Felix K. H.
dc.contributor.coauthorKarakiewicz, Pierre, I.
dc.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya
dc.contributor.kuprofileOther
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.unitKoƧ University Hospital
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T11:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives: to test for differences in perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs (THC) in nonmetastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing open (ORC) versus robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Methods: we relied on the National Inpatient Sample database (2016-2019). Statistics consisted of trend analyses, multivariable logistic, Poisson, and linear regression models. Results Of 5280 patients, 1876 (36%) versus 3200 (60%) underwent RARC versus ORC. RARC increased from 32% to 41% (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]: + 8.6%; p = 0.02). Rates of transfusion (8% vs. 16%), intraoperative (2% vs. 3%), wound (6% vs. 10%), and pulmonary (6% vs. 10%) complications were lower in RARC patients (all p < 0.05). Moreover, median length of stay (LOS) was shorter in RARC (6 vs. 7days; p < 0.001). Conversely, median THC (31,486 vs. 27,162$; p < 0.001) were higher in RARC. Multivariable logistic regression-derived odds ratios addressing transfusion (0.49), intraoperative (0.53), wound (0.68), and pulmonary (0.71) complications favored RARC (all p < 0.01). In multivariable Poisson and linear regression models, RARC was associated with shorter LOS (Rate ratio:0.86; p < 0.001), yet higher THC (Coef.:5,859$; p < 0.001). RARC in-hospital mortality was lower (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.04). Conclusions: RARC complications, LOS, and mortality appear more favorable than ORC, but result in higher THC. The favorable RARC profile contributes to its increasing popularity throughout the United States.
dc.description.fulltextYES
dc.description.indexedbyWoS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.openaccessYES
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipB.H. was awarded a scholarship by the STIFTUNG GIERSCH. OpenAccess funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
dc.description.versionPublisher version
dc.description.volume126
dc.formatpdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jso.26973
dc.identifier.eissn1096-9098
dc.identifier.embargoNO
dc.identifier.filenameinventorynoIR03795
dc.identifier.issn0022-4790
dc.identifier.linkhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26973
dc.identifier.quartileQ2
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85131177582
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/88
dc.identifier.wos805842500001
dc.keywordsBladder cancer
dc.keywordsComplication
dc.keywordsOpen
dc.keywordsOutcomes
dc.keywordsRadical cystectomy
dc.keywordsRobotic-assisted
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.grantnoNA
dc.relation.urihttp://cdm21054.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/IR/id/10657
dc.sourceJournal of Surgical Oncology
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleOutcomes of robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy in a large-scale, contemporary cohort of bladder cancer patients
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorTilki, Derya

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10657.pdf
Size:
643.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format