Publication: Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial
dc.contributor.coauthor | Coates, Alison | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Kung, Allen | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Mounts, Emily | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Hesla, John | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Bankowski, Brandon | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Barbieri, Elizabeth | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Cohen, Jacques | |
dc.contributor.coauthor | Munne, Santiago | |
dc.contributor.department | School of Medicine | |
dc.contributor.kuauthor | Ata, Mustafa Barış | |
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstitute | SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-09T23:11:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare two commonly used protocols (fresh vs. vitrified) used to transfer euploid blastocysts after IVF with preimplantation genetic screening. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Private assisted reproduction center. Patient(s): A total of 179 patients undergoing IVF treatment using preimplantation genetic screening. Intervention(s): Patients were randomized at the time of hCG administration to either a freeze-all cycle or a fresh day 6 ET during the stimulated cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates (sac/embryo transferred), ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) (beyond 8 weeks), and live birth rate per ET in the primary transfer cycle. Result(s): Implantation rate per embryo transferred showed an improvement in the frozen group compared with the fresh group, but not significantly (75% vs. 67%). The ongoing PR (80% vs. 61%) and live birth rates (77% vs. 59%) were significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group. Conclusion(s): Either treatment protocol investigated in the present study can be a reasonable option for patients. Freezing all embryos allows for inclusion of all blastocysts in the cohort of embryos available for transfer, which also results in a higher proportion of patients reaching ET. These findings suggest a trend toward favoring the freeze-all option as a preferred transfer strategy when using known euploid embryos. | |
dc.description.indexedby | WOS | |
dc.description.indexedby | Scopus | |
dc.description.indexedby | PubMed | |
dc.description.issue | 3 | |
dc.description.openaccess | NO | |
dc.description.publisherscope | International | |
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEu | N/A | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Oregon Reproductive Medicine, Portland | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Reprogenetics, NJ Supported by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Oregon Reproductive Medicine, Portland | |
dc.description.sponsorship | and Reprogenetics, NJ. | |
dc.description.volume | 107 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/.fertnstert.2016.12.022 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1556-5653 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0015-0282 | |
dc.identifier.quartile | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85010904531 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9594 | |
dc.identifier.wos | 397985500033 | |
dc.keywords | PGS | |
dc.keywords | Aneuploidy | |
dc.keywords | Transfer | |
dc.keywords | Embryos | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Fertility and Sterility | |
dc.subject | Obstetrics | |
dc.subject | Gynecology | |
dc.subject | Reproductive biology | |
dc.title | Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.contributor.kuauthor | Ata, Mustafa Barış | |
local.publication.orgunit1 | SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | |
local.publication.orgunit2 | School of Medicine | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | d02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd | |
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | d02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd | |
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication | 17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e | |
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e |