Publication:
Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.coauthorCoates, Alison
dc.contributor.coauthorKung, Allen
dc.contributor.coauthorMounts, Emily
dc.contributor.coauthorHesla, John
dc.contributor.coauthorBankowski, Brandon
dc.contributor.coauthorBarbieri, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.coauthorCohen, Jacques
dc.contributor.coauthorMunne, Santiago
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Medicine
dc.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteSCHOOL OF MEDICINE
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T23:11:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare two commonly used protocols (fresh vs. vitrified) used to transfer euploid blastocysts after IVF with preimplantation genetic screening. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Private assisted reproduction center. Patient(s): A total of 179 patients undergoing IVF treatment using preimplantation genetic screening. Intervention(s): Patients were randomized at the time of hCG administration to either a freeze-all cycle or a fresh day 6 ET during the stimulated cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates (sac/embryo transferred), ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) (beyond 8 weeks), and live birth rate per ET in the primary transfer cycle. Result(s): Implantation rate per embryo transferred showed an improvement in the frozen group compared with the fresh group, but not significantly (75% vs. 67%). The ongoing PR (80% vs. 61%) and live birth rates (77% vs. 59%) were significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group. Conclusion(s): Either treatment protocol investigated in the present study can be a reasonable option for patients. Freezing all embryos allows for inclusion of all blastocysts in the cohort of embryos available for transfer, which also results in a higher proportion of patients reaching ET. These findings suggest a trend toward favoring the freeze-all option as a preferred transfer strategy when using known euploid embryos.
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.indexedbyPubMed
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.sponsorshipLife Technologies, Carlsbad, CA
dc.description.sponsorshipOregon Reproductive Medicine, Portland
dc.description.sponsorshipReprogenetics, NJ Supported by Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA
dc.description.sponsorshipOregon Reproductive Medicine, Portland
dc.description.sponsorshipand Reprogenetics, NJ.
dc.description.volume107
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/.fertnstert.2016.12.022
dc.identifier.eissn1556-5653
dc.identifier.issn0015-0282
dc.identifier.quartileQ1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85010904531
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/9594
dc.identifier.wos397985500033
dc.keywordsPGS
dc.keywordsAneuploidy
dc.keywordsTransfer
dc.keywordsEmbryos
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofFertility and Sterility
dc.subjectObstetrics
dc.subjectGynecology
dc.subjectReproductive biology
dc.titleOptimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorAta, Mustafa Barış
local.publication.orgunit1SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
local.publication.orgunit2School of Medicine
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd02929e1-2a70-44f0-ae17-7819f587bedd
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery17f2dc8e-6e54-4fa8-b5e0-d6415123a93e

Files