<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Publication:
Quality assessment of asymmetric stereo video coding

dc.conference.dateSEP 26-29, 2010
dc.conference.locationHong Kong, PEOPLES R CHINA
dc.conference.organizer2010 IEEE international Conference on Image Processing
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
dc.contributor.facultymemberYes
dc.contributor.kuauthorGürler, Cihat Göktuğ
dc.contributor.kuauthorSaygılı, Görkem
dc.contributor.kuauthorTekalp, Ahmet Murat
dc.contributor.schoolcollegeinstituteCollege of Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-09T22:59:27Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractIt is well known that the human visual system can perceive high frequencies in 3D, even if that information is present in only one of the views. therefore, the best 3D stereo quality may be achieved by asymmetric coding where the reference (right) and auxiliary (left) views are coded at unequal PSNR. However, the questions of what should be the level of this asymmetry and whether asymmetry should be achieved by spatial resolution reduction or SNR (quality) reduction are open issues. Extensive subjective tests indicate that when the reference view is encoded at sufficiently high quality, the auxiliary view can be encoded above a low-quality threshold without a noticeable degradation on the perceived stereo video quality. This low-quality threshold may depend on the 3D display; e.g., it is about 31 dB for a parallax barrier display and 33 dB for a polarized projection display. Subjective tests show that, Above this PSNR threshold value, users prefer SNR reduction over spatial resolution reduction on both parallax barrier and polarized projection displays. It is also observed that, if the auxiliary view is encoded below this threshold value, symmetric coding starts to perform better than asymmetric coding in terms of perceived 3D video quality.
dc.description.fulltextNo
dc.description.harvestedfromManual
dc.description.indexedbyWOS
dc.description.indexedbyScopus
dc.description.openaccessNO
dc.description.peerreviewstatusN/A
dc.description.publisherscopeInternational
dc.description.readpublishN/A
dc.description.sponsoredbyTubitakEuN/A
dc.description.studentonlypublicationNo
dc.description.studentpublicationYes
dc.description.versionN/A
dc.identifier.WoSQuartileN/A
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ICIP.2010.5653339
dc.identifier.embargoN/A
dc.identifier.endpage4012
dc.identifier.isbn9781424479948
dc.identifier.issn1522-4880
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78651096609
dc.identifier.startpage4009
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2010.5653339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14288/7892
dc.identifier.wos000287728004017
dc.keywordsStereo video
dc.keywordsAsymmetric coding
dc.keywordsInterview rate allocation
dc.keywords3D video quality evaluation
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
dc.relation.affiliationKoç University
dc.relation.collectionKoç University Institutional Repository
dc.relation.ispartof2010 IEEE international Conference on Image Processing
dc.relation.openaccessN/A
dc.rightsN/A
dc.subjectElectrical electronics engineering
dc.subjectImaging systems
dc.subjectPhotography
dc.titleQuality assessment of asymmetric stereo video coding
dc.typeConference Proceeding
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.contributor.kuauthorSaygılı, Görkem
local.contributor.kuauthorGürler, Cihat Göktuğ
local.contributor.kuauthorTekalp, Ahmet Murat
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication21598063-a7c5-420d-91ba-0cc9b2db0ea0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery21598063-a7c5-420d-91ba-0cc9b2db0ea0
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164
relation.isParentOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8e756b23-2d4a-4ce8-b1b3-62c794a8c164

Files