Researcher: Keremoğlu, M. Erkan
Name Variants
Keremoğlu, M. Erkan
Email Address
Birth Date
3 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Publication Metadata only A novel test coverage metric for concurrently-accessed software components (A work-in-progress paper)(Springer-Verlag Berlin, 2006) N/A; Department of Computer Engineering; N/A; Department of Computer Engineering; Department of Computer Engineering; Taşıran, Serdar; Elmas, Tayfun; Bölükbaşı, Güven; Keremoğlu, M. Erkan; Faculty Member; PhD Student; Undergraduate Student; Reseacher; Department of Computer Engineering; College of Engineering; Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering; College of Engineering, College of Engineering; N/A; N/A; N/A; N/AWe propose a novel, practical coverage metric called "location pairs" (LP) for concurrently-accessed software components. The LP metric captures well common concurrency errors that lead to atomicity or refinement violations. We describe a software tool for measuring LP coverage and outline an inexpensive application of predicate abstraction and model checking for ruling out infeasible coverage targets.Publication Metadata only A classification of concurrency bugs in java benchmarks by developer intent(Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2006) Department of Computer Engineering; Department of Computer Engineering; N/A; Keremoğlu, M. Erkan; Taşıran, Serdar; Elmas, Tayfun; Researcher; Faculty Member; PhD Student; Department of Computer Engineering; College of Engineering; College of Engineering; Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering; N/A; N/A; N/AThis work addresses the issue of selecting the formal correctness criterion for a concurrent Java program that best corresponds to the developer's intent. We study a set of concurrency-related bugs detected in Java benchmarks reported in the literature. On these programs, we determine whether race-freedom, atomicity or refinement is the simplest and most appropriate criterion for program correctness. Our purpose is to demonstrate empirically the fact that the appropriate fix for a concurrency error and the selection of a program analysis tool for detecting such an error must be based on the proper expression of the designer's intent using a formal correctness criterion.Publication Open Access Location pairs: a test coverage metric for shared-memory concurrent programs(Springer, 2012) Muslu, Kıvanç; Department of Computer Engineering; Keremoğlu, M. Erkan; Taşıran, Serdar; Faculty Member; Department of Computer Engineering; College of EngineeringWe present a coverage metric targeted at shared-memory concurrent programs: the Location Pairs (LP) coverage metric. The goals of this metric are (i) to measure how thoroughly a program has been tested from a concurrency standpoint, i.e., whether enough qualitatively different thread interleavings have been explored, and (ii) to guide testing towards unexplored concurrency scenarios. This metric was inspired by an access pattern known to lead to high-level concurrency errors in industrial software and in the literature. We built a monitoring tool to measure LP coverage of test programs. We used the LP metric for interactive debugging, and compared LP coverage with other concurrency coverage metrics on Java benchmarks. We demonstrated that LP coverage corresponds better to concurrency errors, is a better measure of how well a program is exercised concurrency-wise by a test set, reaches saturation later than other coverage metrics, and is viable and useful as an interactive testing and debugging tool.