Publication: Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) with lymph node aspiration: on-site evaluation and final pathology correlation
Program
KU Authors
Co-Authors
Editor & Affiliation
Compiler & Affiliation
Translator
Other Contributor
Date
Language
eng
Type
Embargo Status
N/A
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Alternative Title
Abstract
Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) may improve sample adequacy and expedite clinical decision-making; however, its impact on diagnostic performance and concordance with final pathology remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed consecutive adult patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between February 2023 and January 2024.ROSE adequacy, final diagnostic adequacy, and ROSE-final pathology concordance were calculated.Factors associated with these outcomes were assessed using logistic regression analysis.RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (mean age 6513.8years; 62.2% male) and 203 targets were sampled with 683 aspirations (3.41.8 passes/station).Based on lymph node (LN) level ROSE sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 76.6%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 85.4%, and 90.1%, respectively.The adequacy rates were 89.7% for ROSE and 90.6% for final pathology, and the ROSE-final pathology concordance was 88.2%.Diagnostic discordance occurred in 11.8% of the nodes, most of which were related to limitations in tumor subtyping.A greater number of needle passes was positively associated with ROSE adequacy (P = 0.038) and final adequacy (P = 0.021), whereas a larger LN diameter favored final adequacy (P = 0.045).Larger LNs and greater experience of the final-diagnosis pathologist were associated with lower ROSE-final diagnosis concordance (P = 0.026 and P = 0.015, respectively).CONCLUSION: ROSE during EBUS-TBNA yielded high sensitivity and overall accuracy, demonstrated strong sample adequacy, and showed substantial concordance with the final pathology.Optimizing the number of passes and considering LN size can enhance adequacy, and recognizing the limitations of cytological subtyping and potential observer variability is essential for multidisciplinary decision-making.
Source
Publisher
Galenos
Subject
Medicine
Citation
Has Part
Source
Thoracic Research and Practice
Book Series Title
Edition
DOI
10.4274/thoracrespract.2026.2025-11-1
item.page.datauri
Link
Rights
N/A
Copyrights Note
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as N/A
